I'd like to add my 2 cents here...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheMadBaron It sounds okay. (It's a bit strange to say you saw the toy in the window pane, though. It's more common to say "in the window". You saw the toy through the pane..... but the toy wasn't literally in the pane.
I don't think it's wrong, but perhaps 'toyshop' is better, because it's a REAL shop.... not a toy. |
You're right about the first part, but not the second. "Toy" in this case is an adjective that describes what the shop "does" or sells, in this case toys. "Toyshop" isn't correct otherwise it would be ok to say "Grocerystore" and that's not right either.
Quote:
|
'When' is used to describe the past, and 'while' is used to describe concurrent events. The toyshop scenario is an unfortunate example, because both work in context.
|
Not necessarily. I mean, you're mostly right but it's not that simple. "When" can describe and indefinite action in the past also, if you're using a gerund. For instance "When listening to music, I often pour myself a stiff drink."
This sentence has a couple of indefinite actions going on at the same time yet "when" fits just fine. In that example, when and while are interchangeable. In the case of the toy store, however, the way the verb "walking" is conjugated, "when" doesn't fit. It's colloquial and even a bit common for people to use the construct "when I was walking...." but it's not really correct in this case. The only correct choice for that example is "while".
Quote:
|
Except in the most unusual of circumstances, I don't think you can slam a car door without making a banging sound, so you might as well just say "slam the car door" / "he heard a car door slamming shut".
|
True, you can also say "he heard a car door being slammed shut", it all depends on how descriptive and verbose you want to be. Sometimes it's a good thing sometimes it's not.
-Nah-