Dear teachers and members,
Please help me.
Why is it BE? It should be WAS.
He GRIPPED his brother's arm lest he BE trampled by the mob.
Thank you in advance.
"gripped" is past tense, and so I think "BE" should be "was".
Do you mean "might" is omitted before the "BE".
If so, I understand.
The conjunction lest, which is extremely formal, is one of the very few contexts in the English language where the subjunctive mood is absolutely required.
The normal use is as follows:
Students have to be transported across the campus lest they arrive at their classes in a state of physical exhaustion.
In Buenos Aires, referees are sometimes hustled out under police escort lest they be torn limb from limb by the spectators.
However, you can also use should before the verb:
Students have to be transported across the campus lest they should arrive at their classes in a state of physical exhaustion.
In Buenos Aires, referees are sometimes hustled out under police escort lest they should be torn limb from limb by the spectators.
Note:
Say:
Please explain it to me.Not:
Please explain me.
(Which means something else entirely.)
![]()