One usage is as a verb. The other is as a noun. (Is it still a true contranym?)
- let
n.
Something that hinders; an obstacle: free to investigate without let or hindrance.
Sports. An invalid stroke in tennis and other net games that requires a replay.
tr.v. Archaic let·ted, or let let·ting, lets
To hinder or obstruct.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=let
The etemology is interesting.
- [Middle English lette, from letten, to hinder, from Old English lettan. See l- in Indo-European Roots.]
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=let
:)
I see no reason why it shouldn't be one. Anyway, it was not bad for so early in the day.![]()
I just found out that contranyms can also be called autoantonyms....
check out http://fun-with-words.com/nym_autoantonyms.html
That's news to me- thanks.![]()
I knew that 'cleave' and 'overlook' had that property, as well as 'table' (related to bills, right?).
Thank you very much for the link!
FRC
some additional contranyms are overlook to supervise or omit
inflammable which means able to burst into flames or non flammable