Is it correct to say:
1. In the middle is a blue pattern, above and under which have totally four black lines.
2. In the middle is a blue pattern with totally four black lines above and under.
(The image is:
black line
black line
blue pattern
black line
black line )
In my opinion both of the above sentences are incorrect.
(1) the verb 'have' is incorrectly used; it's a relative clause ('which') and needs an explicit subject ('something has four black lines');
(2) is grammatically better, but still sounds a bit awkward.
Using 'totally', do you mean there are four black lines in total? Since they are split in two groups, it is enough to say:
In the middle is a blue pattern with two black lines above and below (it).
'it' at the end of the sentence is optional, in my opinion.
In a description like this 'below' sounds better than 'under'.
Please note the inversion in the above sentence (the S + V + O principle would make it 'A blue pattern is in the middle...' or at least ('There is a blue pattern in the middle...'). However, the structure 'In the middle is a blue pattern...' is possible and frequently used in very formal written English, e.g. technical texts, instruction manuals, etc.
All the best,
Tee Kay
Thank you for your detalied explanation.![]()
Can I say "Above and under the blue pattern are two black lines" then?
Also,
is it correct to say "Above is two black lines" and "Below is two black lines"?
Should I use "are" here instead of "is"?
Last edited by Eway; 07-Dec-2004 at 09:53.
Yes, this version sounds OK to me.
You can enhance this sentence a little bit by adding "both"Originally Posted by Eway
"Both above and under the blue pattern are two black lines" This gives your sentence the illusion of symmetry, which is basically what you're describing; uniformity.
-Nah-
Thank you!
Ah, and with another preposition "between".
Can I say "Between the two sets of black lines is a blue pattern" or "Between the two sets of black lines shows a blue pattern"?
Last edited by Eway; 08-Dec-2004 at 04:19.