|
#1
| |||
| |||
| 2-Besides Jane I gave the instructions to Sally. 3-Apart from Jane, I gave the instructions to Sally. 4-I gave the instructions to Sally as well as Jane. 5-I gave the instructions to Sally besides Jane. 6-I gave the instructions to Sally apart from Jane. Are the above sentences all correct? Aren't they all ambiguous? First meaning: I gave the instructions to Jane and also to Sally. Second meaning: Jane gave the instructions to Sally and so did I. (Sally was given the instructions twice). I think one can take out the ambiguity by saying: 7-As well as to Jane, I gave the instructions to Sally. But I don't think one can do the same with "besides" or "apart from" (besides to Jane, apart from to Jane) |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for your replies. You say that 1 and 4 are unambiguous. But do they mean that Jane also received the instructions from me or that I gave them also to Jane. Is sentence 7 correct at all? |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Sentences one and four mean that the instructions were given to both Sally and Jane. (Sentence four is more natural.) Sentence seven, I think, is not correct. Another way to say that would be: "I gave the instructions to both Sally and Jane." |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Cheers! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| well, besides, apart |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |