#1  
Old 17-Dec-2003, 11:31
Chibi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default five basic patterns

"The five basic patterns fail to capture the significant intuition stated above that 'complements in intransitive sentences are semantically connected with subjects' while 'complements in transitive sentences are semantically related with objects'" Can anybody tell me why this is correct or incorret?
Thank you very much.
  #2  
Old 17-Dec-2003, 21:48
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,376
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: five basic patterns

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chibi
"The five basic patterns fail to capture the significant intuition stated above that 'complements in intransitive sentences are semantically connected with subjects' while 'complements in transitive sentences are semantically related with objects'" Can anybody tell me why this is correct or incorret?
Thank you very much.
As an intransitive verb doesn't have an object, only a subject, then the complement has to be connected with the subject.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
five, basic, patterns


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are the 5 basic sentence patterns sacred? infinikyte General Language Discussions 49 28-Aug-2009 21:52


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.