in versus on, again
- Thread starter Offroad
- Start date
- Views : 2,241
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2008
- Member Type
- Retired English Teacher
- Native Language
- British English
- Home Country
- England
- Current Location
- Ireland
If someone committed murder in the White House, they did it inside the building. If it was on the White House it was presumably outside, on the roof.
Offroad
Key Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2008
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Brazilian Portuguese
- Home Country
- Brazil
- Current Location
- Brazil
Thanks
One more question:
if we say 'on' the White House based on the fact that we don't know precisely where the incident happened...would it be wrong if it (had) happened inside the building?
Many thanks
One more question:
if we say 'on' the White House based on the fact that we don't know precisely where the incident happened...would it be wrong if it (had) happened inside the building?
Many thanks
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2008
- Member Type
- Retired English Teacher
- Native Language
- British English
- Home Country
- England
- Current Location
- Ireland
Yes, it would be wrong. Use "at" for that situation.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Member Type
- Other
- Native Language
- American English
- Home Country
- United States
- Current Location
- United States
No, you would say "on the White House" if it happened on the roof!
You'd say "at the White House" if it happened in or near the White House, somewhere on the White House grounds. It doesn't have to be inside, but it could have been.
You'd say "at the White House" if it happened in or near the White House, somewhere on the White House grounds. It doesn't have to be inside, but it could have been.
- Status
