Language and Thought

Hi, everyone
Do language and thought occur simultaneously?

taghavi said:

Hi, everyone
Do language and thought occur simultaneously?

Click to expand...

They do if you believe in the Whorfian hypothesis.

Thanks,
And do the scientists of the period think so?

taghavi said:

Thanks,
And do the scientists of the period think so?

Click to expand...

They're working on it.

'Language is the dress of thought.' Samuel Johnson (Not sure that I agree with him, though.)

What about animal thought, e.g. the thought of a dog?

Frank Antonson said:

What about animal thought, e.g. the thought of a dog?

Click to expand...

True true!!
When I say "dog", I simultaneously think of a dog.
(Picture of a dog : Conception into perception.)
But, when I say "untill", I can't think of anything. Nothing occurs to my mind. :-?

Hi Trance Freak. Good to see you again.

You DO know what I mean, don't you? That a dog can clearly think, and yet does not have a language like ours. I wonder if a dog can think of "until". I am pretty sure a dog can think "if", as in "If he is eating some steak, he might give me some."

taghavi said:

Hi, everyone
Do language and thought occur simultaneously?

Click to expand...

I'm not schooled in the area of linguistics, but find the subject extremely fascinating. I'm not trained in this area but am very excited to learn more. Language and thought: Do they occur simultaneously? an easy answer to the question would be yes, language and thought seem to be simultaneous. However, language and thought formations are not that easily explained. Language is a very board word - are you referring to speaking? writing? depending on which you select the answer may be different.

With that in mind, I will apply my analysis of your question to speaking. I do not believe that speaking/thinking occurrences are simultaneous, why at least not initially. I believe that in order to form language one needs a stimulus - thought. With thought's stimulation - he will start collecting from his memory vault things that help create a thought process that will make him believe that all that he is saying means sense. Once he gets a thought that passes muster - he calls on his friend Speaks to help him spread the news.

Thanks

Frank Antonson said:

Hi Trance Freak. Good to see you again.

You DO know what I mean, don't you? That a dog can clearly think, and yet does not have a language like ours. I wonder if a dog can think of "until". I am pretty sure a dog can think "if", as in "If he is eating some steak, he might give me some."

Click to expand...

Animals can think IMO, but obviously do it non-linguistically, so it's very hard for us to imagine what processes they use. I had a dog that went blind and he had to learn all sorts of things to get around. He knew exactly how many steps there were in my house, for example, but how he counted them was a mystery to me.

Japan, where I'm living now, is inundated with unbelievably clever crows. How on earth did they work this one out:

For instance, crows of many species learn to drop nuts and other hard food items like clams from just the right height over just the right hard substrate to break them open. But carrion crows living near a driving school in Japan learned to use cars to do the work for them. These crows wait for traffic to stop at an intersection, fly down and place the nuts in front of the tires of the stopped vehicles, then retrieve the nutmeats from the nuts cracked open when the cars ran over them. Over the last 20 years, this behavior gradually spread beyond the immediate vicinity of the school—and people have begun to help the crows by deliberately running over the nuts on the road!

Click to expand...

Books, Naturally - National Zoo| FONZ

Tdol said:

Animals can think IMO, but obviously do it non-linguistically, so it's very hard for us to imagine what processes they use. I had a dog that went blind and he had to learn all sorts of things to get around. He knew exactly how many steps there were in my house, for example, but how he counted them was a mystery to me.

Click to expand...

Not only other animals, but humans too. The skills of a baby before it obtains linguistic communication are well documented, including those skills communication is best used for - getting what we want and social interaction.

As for whether thought exists independently from language, it depends what 'thought' is to you. I'm currently using my fingers to type - what I'm typing is governed by language, however, how I type it isn't governed by language at all. I can do many things which require no linguistic ability whatsoever, but you could say they require thought.

Even with more higher functioning thought, a distinction has to be made about what is language and what is a concept. Concepts aren't language. For example, the concept of object permanence - that an object out of sight still exists. This develops in babies before they have any linguistic abilities.

Linguist__ said:

Not only other animals, but humans too. The skills of a baby before it obtains linguistic communication are well documented, including those skills communication is best used for - getting what we want and social interaction.

As for whether thought exists independently from language, it depends what 'thought' is to you. I'm currently using my fingers to type - what I'm typing is governed by language, however, how I type it isn't governed by language at all. I can do many things which require no linguistic ability whatsoever, but you could say they require thought.

Even with more higher functioning thought, a distinction has to be made about what is language and what is a concept. Concepts aren't language. For example, the concept of object permanence - that an object out of sight still exists. This develops in babies before they have any linguistic abilities.

Click to expand...

Hi Linguist,
As far as I understand, "thought" comes before 'speech', yes?

taghavi said:

Hi Linguist,
As far as I understand, "thought" comes before 'speech', yes?

Click to expand...

In my opinion, yes. But my opinion isn't based on scientific 'fact', so it is probably wrong. I don't know what the current scientific explanation is for it, or indeed whether there needs to be one.

Linguist__ said:

As for whether thought exists independently from language, it depends what 'thought' is to you.

Click to expand...

Once we've acquired language, it's seemingly impossible not to use it, so we'll never really be able to get back to the pre-language state. I agree that there are other forms of thought, but language is the 800-pound gorilla.

This has been a very interesting thread -- for which language has probably proved inadequate.

Frank Antonson said:

This has been a very interesting thread -- for which language has probably proved inadequate.

Click to expand...

I asked someone who taught linguistics in one of the best universities in the U.S about this question before, and she had agreed on what Linguist said. She didn't agree that language and tought occured simultaneously; however, we see both Vigotsky and Whorf critisizing Piage's idea in this case. Yes, there is still a controversy.