Amount ... are

Status
Not open for further replies.

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
Why "are" instead of "is"?

"After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, a massive amount of resources are inevitably deployed to shield the most precious targets, but there is a Sisyphean element to such a task."

Thanks!
 

shroob

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Why "are" instead of "is"?

"After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, a massive amount of resources are inevitably deployed to shield the most precious targets, but there is a Sisyphean element to such a task."

Thanks!

Not a teacher only a native.

'Are' is used because 'resources' is plural.
 

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
Not a teacher only a native.

'Are' is used because 'resources' is plural.

But isn't "amount" the noun that the verb refers back to?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Was there a yes/no question somewhere? I thought it was is/are?
 

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
Was there a yes/no question somewhere? I thought it was is/are?

In post no. 3 I asked this question: "But isn't "amount" the noun that the verb refers back to?"
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
OK, I read that wrong. I thought he was asking if you would say "is" or "are."
 

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
OK, I read that wrong. I thought he was asking if you would say "is" or "are."

I would say "is" because I think "amount" is the "noun of reference." (I just made up that term; I don't know the correct grammatical term.)
 

shroob

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I would say "is" because I think "amount" is the "noun of reference." (I just made up that term; I don't know the correct grammatical term.)

Not a teacher only a native.

"After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, a massive amount of resourcesare inevitably deployed to shield the most precious targets, but there is a Sisyphean element to such a task."

Having read the sentence over and over again, 'is' seems to also fit.

I think this is to do with the 'a' (after London), which makes the 'massive amount of resources' appear as a single noun, but I could be wrong.

If it was just 'After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, massive amounts of resources are inevitably deployed....' then 'are' would be the word of choice.

Hopefully an actual teacher will clear things up.
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I would say "are." I think there's a loophole in the rules somewhere that allows this. It doesn't sound right to my ear to use "is" here.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
A ____ of ____ can be used two ways.

One is to make the A ___ the quantifier, simply telling you how many of the second ____ there are.

Many students are entering the museum
Several students are entering the museum.
A bunch of students are...
A busload of student are...

It only makes sense to use the plural form in that case. I would argue that "A massive amount of resources..." is being used that way.

The other way is when the A ____ is the subject of the sentence and the second ____ is simply telling you more about that noun.

A family of 12 is hard to feed.
A colony of red-tailed warblers is...
A village of people who had never contacted the outside world before was discovered.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I'm going to play devil's advocate here:

A large number of people is/are attending the concert tonight?

Which would you say is correct? Is or are?
 

Allen165

Key Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Switzerland
I'm going to play devil's advocate here:

A large number of people is/are attending the concert tonight?

Which would you say is correct? Is or are?

I'm going to abstain. ;-)
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
OK, I read that wrong. I thought he was asking if you would say "is" or "are."
No, you read it right.
I'd say "are", since the sense is plural, as it is in emsr2d2's example.
 
Last edited:

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I would always use plural with "A [large] number of..."

I would use "is" with "The number of... "

A number of questions were raised.
The number of questions raised was surprising.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Why "are" instead of "is"?

"After an attack like 9/11 in the United States or 7/7 in London, a massive amount of resources are inevitably deployed to shield the most precious targets, but there is a Sisyphean element to such a task."

Thanks!


***** NOT A TEACHER *****


Hello, Allen:

(1) Here is what some experts have written:

(a) Mr. Michael Swan's Practical English Usage says:

"A large number of problems still have to be solved" is "more

natural" than "A large amount of problems [still have to be solved]."

(b) Mr. L.G. Alexander's Longman English Grammar says we use "A great

amount of" + uncountable noun. His example: "A great amount of money

is spent on research." He tells us to use "A great number of" for

plural countable nouns. His example: A great number of our students are

American.

*** THEN HE ADDS:

"Some native speakers use amount of with countable nouns as well:

A large /great amount of our investments are in property."

(c) Webster's Niinth New Collegiate Dictionary does not discuss the verb

question but it reminds us:

"The less common use of amount with count nouns has been frequently

criticized; it seens to occur most often when the number of things can

be visualized [my emphasis] as a mass <glad to furnish any amount of

black pebbles> or when money is involved <a substantial amount of

loans>.

The bottom line:


If I understand those experts, it seems that the sentence you quoted

should refer to "a massive number of resources are ...."


Sincerely,


James
 

Offroad

Key Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Brazilian Portuguese
Home Country
Brazil
Current Location
Brazil
It's the same as

Brazil play England tonight.

Some people may say plays.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
It's the same as

Brazil play England tonight.

Some people may say plays.
No, it's a slightly different concept. You're referring to the problem of whether 'group' or 'team' or 'committee' is treated as singular or plural. There is disagreement here about this.

In the "amount of/number of" case, we all know that 'amount' and number' are singular, yet those of us who are game enough to give an opinion, all say we'd still use 'are'. So, the explanation is different.
It could be that we all instinctively realise that "a huge amount of resources" means "many resources"; "a large number of people" means "many people". The plural verb is correct. If anything, the use of 'amount' and 'number' is wrong - but it's what we say.

Also, I think that when "resources" is changed to something like "apples" (of which the amount can be quantified meaningfully, eg. 4.5 tons), we could say "A large amount apples (4.5 tons) was sent". But to say that 600 tons of resources was sent, when the resources are a heterogenous mix of items and hence are not meaningfully quantified like this, the sense become "many resources".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top