Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Ulysses is offline Junior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • American Samoa
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    68
    Post Thanks / Like

    Using Commas Before a Conjunction Between 2 Independent Clauses - Necessary?

    Ok this seems like a relatively new concept to me. I'm now hearing that you join 2 independent clauses with a comma as well as a conjunction after. I can understand the conjunction as it expresses a relationship between the 2 clauses (and without it, there would be nothing joining up the clauses) but why the comma?

    Is it really necessary and why put it if it's not necessary?

    Take for example:
    Today, along many streets in Canada, there are healthy chestnut trees, but they are not related to the American chestnut
    I don't see why there is a comma but is it there because the part 'but they are not related to the American chestnut' an appositive or nonrestrictive clause?

  2. #2
    bhaisahab's Avatar
    bhaisahab is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    23,071
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Using Commas Before a Conjunction Between 2 Independent Clauses - Necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ulysses View Post
    Ok this seems like a relatively new concept to me. I'm now hearing that you join 2 independent clauses with a comma as well as a conjunction after. I can understand the conjunction as it expresses a relationship between the 2 clauses (and without it, there would be nothing joining up the clauses) but why the comma?

    Is it really necessary and why put it if it's not necessary?

    Take for example:


    I don't see why there is a comma but is it there because the part 'but they are not related to the American chestnut' an appositive or nonrestrictive clause?
    I think the comma before 'but' is unnecessary.

Similar Threads

  1. [Grammar] Dependent clauses after independent clauses.
    By Sammy_ in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-Mar-2009, 12:31
  2. Use of Commas with Subordinate Clauses
    By Dave K in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19-Dec-2008, 23:31
  3. independent and dependent clauses
    By Unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2008, 18:51
  4. Two independent clauses without a conjunction?
    By musicgold in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Jul-2008, 23:58

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •