Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5 11 12 13 14 15
Results 141 to 146 of 146

Thread: I thought I had


    • Join Date: Sep 2009
    • Posts: 422
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #141

    Re: I thought I had

    Quote Originally Posted by PROESL View Post
    I don't believe that the expansion of such points of view is relevant to ESL and EFL. It's not practical.
    I read your opinions on that, I think more than once, and I agree fully. Nothing in my discussions on this issue would suggest that I seekt to include "anylish" in any ESL program.


    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 2,036
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #142

    Re: I thought I had

    Quote Originally Posted by albeit View Post
    I read your opinions on that, I think more than once, and I agree fully. Nothing in my discussions on this issue would suggest that I seekt to include "anylish" in any ESL program.
    I didn't saying anything about what should be included in programs. I said I don't believe the expansion of such points of view is relevant to ESL and EFL. Now, please, do not attempt to build a case against something that someone did not say or did not set forth as any sort of assertion or claim. This is not about paraphrasing or saying something in a different way. It's an interesting device to attempt to use, but it doesn't work with me.
    Last edited by PROESL; 23-Sep-2009 at 07:38.


    • Join Date: Sep 2009
    • Posts: 422
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #143

    Re: I thought I had

    Quote Originally Posted by PROESL View Post
    No, I have made no contradictory statements. Speaking of "would" and its application to past time has nothing to do with how I've compared the two sentences that you insist must be reported speech. You should refrain from telling one what one seems like or does not seem like.
    This has nothing to do with "the two sentences", Pro, and I certainly didn't insist they were anything. I think if you check, you'll find I used words like, "they could hold different meanings but ... "

    The two statements that I believe were contradictory were;

    1. "I know how reported speech works" [might not be the actual wording but that's the full gist of it]

    AND

    2. "[would] only works out to be the past of [__] in certain instances, and these instances are often reported speech".

    http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/as...upposed-5.html

    If you know how reported speech works how can you have said what you said in 2.?


    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 2,036
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #144

    Re: I thought I had

    Quote Originally Posted by albeit View Post
    This has nothing to do with "the two sentences", Pro, and I certainly didn't insist they were anything. I think if you check, you'll find I used words like, "they could hold different meanings but ... "

    The two statements that I believe were contradictory were;

    1. "I know how reported speech works" [might not be the actual wording but that's the full gist of it]

    AND

    2. "[would] only works out to be the past of [__] in certain instances, and these instances are often reported speech".

    http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/as...upposed-5.html

    If you know how reported speech works how can you have said what you said in 2.?
    Once again, this is not relevant to the topic of simple past versus past perfect as it has been discussed in this thread. I find it confounding that one would bring such information into this discussion. It's not related.

    It's pretty simple. Here it is: In the two sentences that you are talking about, I showed how using the past perfect as opposed to the simple past could affect meaning given information that a speaker and a listener both know about. The assertion that the past perfect would, therefore, be a better choice is something you seem to not agree with. Furthermore, for some reason, you would like me to agree with you. I don't agree. So just as others have agreed to disagree, it would be best if we agreed to disagree.


    • Join Date: Sep 2009
    • Posts: 422
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #145

    Re: I thought I had

    Quote Originally Posted by PROESL View Post
    Once again, this is not relevant to the topic of simple past versus past perfect as it has been discussed in this thread. I find it confounding that one would bring such information into this discussion. It's not related.
    As you wish. I've moved it to,

    http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/as...-i-had-15.html

  1. BobK's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2006
    • Posts: 15,854
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #146

    Re: I thought I had

    Quote Originally Posted by konungursvia View Post
    I thought we had finished.
    Me too. This issue has been sputtering on for too long. I don't like quashing debate, but I'm closing this thread because it's generating more heat than light.

    b

Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5 11 12 13 14 15

Similar Threads

  1. verb tense for verbs after "I thought..."
    By tomyfreebie in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 19-Aug-2009, 19:12
  2. I thought it rude vs I thought it was rude
    By Federerexpress in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Sep-2008, 16:25
  3. never thought; didn't think
    By joham in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Apr-2008, 10:48
  4. Thought for the day/ Thought of the day
    By daelor123 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-Sep-2007, 19:24

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •