Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: two questions

  1. #1
    Anonymous Guest

    Default two questions

    Hi,

    I don't quite understand the underlined sentences of the following two paragraphs. Could anyone do me a favor? Thanks a lot.

    1. Having 'learned the lessons of Vietnam' where the news media purportedly encouraged opposition to the war to ferment, British officials wasted no time in mobilizing a propaganda campaign designed to ensure that the 'true nature' of the otherwise faceless Argentine enemy would be sympathetically relayed via the news coverage.
    2. Journalists relied almost entirely on officials for their information, their access to the fighting being strictly controlled both formally and informally. They were also forces to 'poor' their copy and photographs in order to facilitate military censorship. Any effort to include the word 'censored' on filmed reports was itself censored.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    508
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: two questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Celia
    Hi,

    I don't quite understand the underlined sentences of the following two paragraphs. Could anyone do me a favor? Thanks a lot.

    1. Having 'learned the lessons of Vietnam' where the news media purportedly encouraged opposition to the war to ferment, British officials wasted no time in mobilizing a propaganda campaign designed to ensure that the 'true nature' of the otherwise faceless Argentine enemy would be sympathetically relayed via the news coverage.
    2. Journalists relied almost entirely on officials for their information, their access to the fighting being strictly controlled both formally and informally. They were also forces to 'poor' their copy and photographs in order to facilitate military censorship. Any effort to include the word 'censored' on filmed reports was itself censored.
    The second paragraph underlined:
    "Any effort to include the word "censored" on filmed reports was itself censored."

    The report cannot carry the word "censored" so the readers couldn't tell the reports had been cut by the military. They got the impression the report was whole - story, pictures, and all.

    BMO

  3. #3
    RonBee's Avatar
    RonBee is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    16,571
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Apparently, "sypathetically" in the first underlined part means that the British wanted coverage to be sympathetic to their point of view, and that would be accomplished by portraying the "true nature" of the enemy.

Similar Threads

  1. A newbie with usage questions
    By Francois in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-Jan-2007, 10:41
  2. questions - have to/must, article, mistakes
    By Lenka in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 25-Sep-2004, 07:32
  3. questions from "Friends" script
    By welldone in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-Jul-2004, 19:32
  4. Answering questions
    By dduck in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-Sep-2003, 23:57

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •