Results 1 to 4 of 4

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 90
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Question infinitive without to (passive)

    1. I saw him questioned by the police.
    2. I saw him be questioned by the police.
    3. I saw him to be questioned by the police.
    4. I saw him being questioned by the police.


    Which sentences above are correct & which are wrong? Could you tell me the difference in meaning between sentence 3 and sentence 4?


    Your help is cordially appreciated.

  1. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,227
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: infinitive without to (passive)

    Quote Originally Posted by kl004535 View Post
    1. I saw him questioned by the police.
    2. I saw him be questioned by the police.
    3. I saw him to be questioned by the police.
    4. I saw him being questioned by the police.


    Which sentences above are correct & which are wrong? Could you tell me the difference in meaning between sentence 3 and sentence 4?


    Your help is cordially appreciated.
    4. is the most common, and probably the only one I'd use.
    3. is wrong
    1. and 2. might be acceptable in some places. They sound marginal to me.

    I'd like to hear others' opinions on 1. and 2.


    • Join Date: Jul 2006
    • Posts: 2,890
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: infinitive without to (passive)

    Among 1, 2, 3, to me 1 is the most acceptable. 'see' as a verb has complex transitive complementation, SVOC, where C = inf. clause whose 'to be' is wiped away.
    I am not convinced that #3 is incorrect grammar. We just do not use 'to', although it is still there.

  2. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,227
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: infinitive without to (passive)

    Quote Originally Posted by svartnik View Post
    Among 1, 2, 3, to me 1 is the most acceptable. 'see' as a verb has complex transitive complementation, SVOC, where C = inf. clause whose 'to be' is wiped away.
    I am not convinced that #3 is incorrect grammar. We just do not use 'to', although it is still there.
    Naturally I meant native speakers' opinions, svartnik. But your opinion on 3. is ... interesting! Is this common in Hungarian English?

Similar Threads

  1. Could you correct the sentences of passive voice
    By WUKEN in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15-Jul-2009, 16:56
  2. [General] Perfect Continuous Infinitive
    By vil in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-Mar-2009, 18:36
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-Feb-2009, 10:29
  4. organization
    By Aldana in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Dec-2005, 11:20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •