Results 1 to 4 of 4
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • French
      • Home Country:
      • France
      • Current Location:
      • China

    • Join Date: Oct 2008
    • Posts: 57
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Smile simple past tense indicating future time

    Hi there:
    could you please give me an example of the usage of the simple past tense indicating future time in English? I've got two but am not sure which one is correct or neither.
    1 he said he would leave for tomorrow.
    2 he would leave for tomorrow.
    is there any difference between the two woulds in question in relation to time reference?
    could you give me one more exmaple?
    thank you

  1. bhaisahab's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England

    • Join Date: Apr 2008
    • Posts: 23,083
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: simple past tense indicating future time

    Quote Originally Posted by guzhao67 View Post
    Hi there:
    could you please give me an example of the usage of the simple past tense indicating future time in English? I've got two but am not sure which one is correct or neither.
    1 he said he would leave for tomorrow.
    2 he would leave for tomorrow.
    is there any difference between the two woulds in question in relation to time reference?
    could you give me one more exmaple?
    thank you
    Both are incorrect. Are you trying to say that he is leaving tomorrow?


    • Join Date: Dec 2009
    • Posts: 700
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: simple past tense indicating future time

    Quote Originally Posted by guzhao67 View Post
    Hi there:
    could you please give me an example of the usage of the simple past tense indicating future time in English? I've got two but am not sure which one is correct or neither.
    1 he said he would leave for tomorrow.
    2 he would leave for tomorrow.
    is there any difference between the two woulds in question in relation to time reference?
    could you give me one more exmaple?
    thank you
    We wouldn't use "for" here unless we were speaking very poetically! So I assume you mean to say the following:
    1 He said he would leave tomorrow.
    2 He would leave tomorrow.

    Let's begin with the second sentence. Here "would" is not the same as "will." In fact, the sentence is ambiguous and is not something you would ordinarily hear. It needs something to tell us whether it is a case of the conditional ("If we gave him the money he would leave tomorrow") or something else (as in the first sentence.)

    The first sentence, as well, implies to me a certain ambiguity. If you say, "He said he will leave tomorrow," you are clearly saying that his action is in the future. "He said he would leave tomorrow," on the other hand, suggests to me that he may or may not be going on that day or at all. Ordinarily you would use "would" to imply less certainty.

    Having said that, you could probably use "would" here and people would understand it as simple future, as you suggest.

    It is a subtle thing. Perhaps others can explain it better.

  2. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,227
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: simple past tense indicating future time

    Quote Originally Posted by guzhao67 View Post
    Hi there:
    could you please give me an example of the usage of the simple past tense indicating future time in English? I've got two but am not sure which one is correct or neither.
    1 he said he would leave for tomorrow.
    2 he would leave for tomorrow.
    is there any difference between the two woulds in question in relation to time reference?
    could you give me one more exmaple?
    thank you
    I'm not sure whether using "would" is the right way to answer to this question. You've chosen it for it's dubious status as the simple past of 'will'.
    How about:
    If he went to Sydney tomorrow, I'd be all alone.
    If he left in the morning, he'd be there for dinner.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2009, 12:18
  2. shall
    By sash2008 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 09-Sep-2009, 15:51
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Mar-2009, 18:34
  4. [Grammar] Totally lost - Past simple
    By engpoem in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-Oct-2008, 07:41
  5. A strange use of tense
    By shun in forum Linguistics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2006, 03:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •