Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

    • Join Date: Feb 2010
    • Posts: 5
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    couldn't have VS mustn't have

    I always have trouble teaching the difference between these two to show degrees of negative certainty.

    For example, is there much difference between these:

    He mustn't have been very hungry.

    He couldn't have been very hungry.

    Thanks.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 45,238
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    I'd use the second to contradict or emphasise.

  1. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,646
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by Kendama View Post
    I always have trouble teaching the difference between these two to show degrees of negative certainty.

    For example, is there much difference between these:

    He mustn't have been very hungry.

    He couldn't have been very hungry.

    Thanks.
    I think meaning is more important than trying to rank modals in order of possibility/certainty, etc.

    These sentences can mean completely different things.
    He mustn't have been hungry - because he didn't eat what we gave him.
    He couldn't have been hungry; he had just eaten a seven course meal.


    As far as ranking modals, I believe there are are three basic levels of probability.
    No possibility at all: He won't come.
    A possibility: He [might, may, could] come.
    Certainty: He will come.

    Any other distinctions need to be done with adverbs.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Polish
      • Home Country:
      • Poland
      • Current Location:
      • Poland

    • Join Date: Oct 2009
    • Posts: 1,704
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by Raymott View Post
    He mustn't have been hungry - because he didn't eat what we gave him.
    He couldn't have been hungry; he had just eaten a seven course meal.
    Can't the second one mean that he didn't eat what you gave him too?

  2. mara_ce's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Spanish
      • Home Country:
      • Argentina
      • Current Location:
      • Argentina

    • Join Date: Jun 2009
    • Posts: 6,066
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by Kendama View Post
    He mustn't have been very hungry.

    He couldn't have been very hungry.
    Iím not a native speaker but I usually teach this type of things.
    In my opinion, the first one doesnít make sense. Iíd say:

    He canít have been very hungry. (couldnít have is possible instead of canít have)

    Must have and canít have are used to make deductions about past actions.

    I must have left my wallet in the car. (Iím sure I did)
    Jim canít have noticed you. (Iím sure he didnít)

    To express possibility or uncertainty about past actions you can use might have, may have and could have.

    Jean might have missed the train. (Perhaps she did)
    He may not have received the letter. (Perhaps he didnít)
    You could have been killed! (It was a possibility)

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2009
    • Posts: 3,505
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Yes.

  3. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,646
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by mmasny View Post
    Can't the second one mean that he didn't eat what you gave him too?
    Yes, it's ambiguous; and that is partly why I say that they shouldn't be seen as merely differences in degree, and why you need adverbials to discriminate meanings.

  4. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,646
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #8

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by mara_ce View Post
    Iím not a native speaker but I usually teach this type of things.
    In my opinion, the first one doesnít make sense.
    It does make sense to a native speaker. It means the same as "He can't have been very hungry."

    Must have and canít have are used to make deductions about past actions and states.
    That's right. And since he didn't eat the food we gave him, we deduce that "He mustn't have been very hungry" or that "He can't have been very hungry".
    R.

  5. mara_ce's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Spanish
      • Home Country:
      • Argentina
      • Current Location:
      • Argentina

    • Join Date: Jun 2009
    • Posts: 6,066
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #9

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by Raymott View Post
    R.
    Thank you, Iíve learned something new! I had never seen 'mustnít' associated with certainty. My grammar books relate it to prohibition.

  6. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,646
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #10

    Re: couldn't have VS mustn't have

    Quote Originally Posted by mara_ce View Post
    Thank you, I’ve learned something new! I had never seen 'mustn’t' associated with certainty. My grammar books relate it to prohibition.
    Yes that's true, but you can't prohibit something that has already either happened or not happened in the past. That frees up mustn't for a different meaning in the past. "Must have" is used more commonly than "mustn't have" for the past.

    I'm sure you've heard of this situation:
    Peter: Where is Mary? She was supposed to be here an hour ago.
    John: She must have missed her bus.


    This doesn't mean "She had to miss her bus". It means "I deduce that she has missed her bus."
    Similar principles apply to "mustn't" in the past.

    Grammar books rarely cover the modal verbs comprehensively because there is just too much you could write about them.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. He must have seen it, mustn't he?
    By joham in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-Mar-2008, 11:13
  2. mustn't, needn't, shouldn't
    By joham in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-Mar-2008, 15:47
  3. 'Mustn't' in question-tags
    By AlainK in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13-Oct-2007, 15:54
  4. mustn't; can't
    By Lenka in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-Sep-2006, 12:57
  5. don't have to, mustn't
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-Oct-2004, 22:01

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •