Results 1 to 7 of 7

    • Join Date: Jul 2005
    • Posts: 8
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Can you show me ?

    Are there any diferences between " Everything you have to do is to find them " and " Everything you have to do is to find them " ?
    Thank you teacher .

  1. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: Can you show me ?

    Quote Originally Posted by David
    "Everything you have to do is to find them"
    "Everything you have to do is to find them"
    David, you've typed in the same sentence.


    • Join Date: Jul 2005
    • Posts: 8
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Talking Re: Can you show me ?

    Oh, Sorry, but I mean:
    Everything you have to do is finding them
    Everything you have to do is to find them
    Everything you have to do is find them

    Can you show me the difference ?
    Thanks

  2. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: Can you show me ?

    It's the "Everything" that has me stumped. Try,

    All you have to do is . . . .

    As for the last part, I'd choose "(to) find them".


    • Join Date: Jul 2005
    • Posts: 8
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Question Re: Can you show me ?

    So what about the others, are they alright ?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 45,852
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6

    Re: Can you show me ?

    I don't like the first with 'finding', and I agree with Casiopea about the other two.

  3. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7

    Re: Can you show me ?

    Additionally, in that construction 'is' links two like structures. That's why 'to' occurs twice:

    [1] All you have to do is to find them. (to-infinitive is to-infinitive)

    As for [2] (see below) the second 'to' is omitted because it's redundant. That is, 'to' has already been stated in 'to do', so the speaker/writer leaves the second 'to' out.

    [2] All you have to do is find them. (to-infinitive is infinitive)

    All the best,

Similar Threads

  1. About learning movie screenplays and TV show transcripts
    By english-learner in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-Apr-2005, 11:42
  2. Some dialogues from US TV show
    By geniusb in forum English Idioms and Sayings
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14-Nov-2004, 08:43
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-Jun-2004, 15:53

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •