Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: question

  1. Munch's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Aug 2010
    • Posts: 479
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #11

    Re: question

    "I am living here for two years" sounds fine to me.

    However - at first I thought it was an error because I have heard learners of English say similar things when they meant "I have lived here for two years."

    You can see for yourself. Do a Google search for "I am living here for" and you will mostly find non-native speakers using the phrase incorrectly, with a sprinkling of native speakers using the phrase (correctly in my opinion) in the manner fivejedjon mentioned.
    Last edited by Munch; 30-Nov-2010 at 09:04.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • Hungarian
      • Home Country:
      • Hungary
      • Current Location:
      • Hungary

    • Join Date: Feb 2010
    • Posts: 1,121
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #12

    Re: question

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    #1 is grammatical in the sense: This place is my temporary home for a period of two years. Probably some native speakers would use stay rather than live.
    It could also be used with a future sense, though Lauralie's version is more likely to be heard.
    #2 means that I began to live here two days ago, and I still live here.
    I am with Lauralie.

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    #2 means that I began to live here two days ago, and I still live here.
    True, but the progressive present does not collocate with temporal adjuncts such as 'for two years' because the idea of 'around now' would be lost with them.

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    #1 is grammatical in the sense: This place is my temporary home for a period of two years. Probably some native speakers would use stay rather than [I]live.
    Future arising from present arrangement: this is what you mean, right? I have seen the use of the present progressive in this sense only with events with relatively short duration. I think it is the temporal adverbial that puts a spoke in in your argument's wheel.

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: question

    Quote Originally Posted by corum View Post
    the progressive present does not collocate with temporal adjuncts such as 'for two years' because the idea of 'around now' would be lost with them.

    Oh, but it can, when the present progressive is used for future arrangement:

    "You had better arrive on time. I'm waiting for two minutes and then I'm leaving. If you're more than two minutes late, hard luck."

    Oher constructions are more likely to be used, but that's posible.


    Future arising from present arrangement: this is what you mean, right? I have seen the use of the present progressive in this sense only with events with relatively short duration.

    I am staying on here for another two years, and then I'm going back to England."

    That appears to me to be acceptable.

    5

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • Hungarian
      • Home Country:
      • Hungary
      • Current Location:
      • Hungary

    • Join Date: Feb 2010
    • Posts: 1,121
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #14

    Re: question

    I am staying here for another two years, and then I'm going back to England."

    That appears to me to be acceptable.
    Sounds okay to me too.

    And this?
    I am living here for another two years and then I am going back to England.

    Can't explain why it is not okay to my ears. It is not said very often. Probably that is why. Not very idiomatic.

    Oh, but it can, when the present progressive is used for future arrangement:
    Which I mentioned too.

    'I am living here for two years' can't be used in the sense of 'around now'. That is what I meant.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Just a quick question please - Detail in a question.
    By richuk in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13-Apr-2010, 13:59
  2. [Grammar] multiple choice question "i asked the same question before "
    By dsfly16 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-Aug-2009, 16:02
  3. [Grammar] Negative Question, Leading Question
    By unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-Feb-2009, 15:17
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-Jun-2008, 13:12
  5. what's kind of question is good question?
    By Phoenix Wu in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-May-2008, 08:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •