Results 1 to 6 of 6
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Jul 2010
    • Posts: 48
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    You've a lot of pictures.

    Can the word "have" be contracted when it's the only verb in a sentence? Please help. Thank you.

    You've a lot of pictures.
    Last edited by giddyman; 26-Dec-2010 at 05:31.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • China

    • Join Date: Dec 2009
    • Posts: 774
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: You've a lot of pictures.

    Quote Originally Posted by giddyman View Post
    Can the word "have" be contracted when it's the only verb in a sentence? Please help. Thank you.

    You've a lot of pictures.
    The pattern is that auxiliary verb contract with the subject; e.g. I'm (I am); I'll (I will), but full verbs do not contract; e.g., I watch, not *I'atch; I look, not *I'ook, but in speech some speakers do, in fact, contract the full verb 'have' with the subject; e.g., You've a lot of pictures, which for some speakers is unacceptable.
    Last edited by lauralie2; 26-Dec-2010 at 13:41. Reason: comma placement

  1. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: You've a lot of pictures.

    Quote Originally Posted by giddyman View Post
    Can the word "have" be contracted when it's the only verb in a sentence? Please help. Thank you.

    You've a lot of pictures.
    It's acceptable in BrE - though 'you've got' is more common in speech these days.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: You've a lot of pictures.

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    It's acceptable in BrE - though 'you've got' is more common in speech these days.
    It is used in BrE, but I would agree with Lauralie2 that some people find it unacceptable and regard it as an error. I don't use it, but can't see much wrong with it, though.

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Re: You've a lot of pictures.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tdol View Post
    It is used in BrE, but I would agree with Lauralie2 that some people find it unacceptable and regard it as an error. I don't use it, but can't see much wrong with it, though.
    I am surprised that some regard it as an error. Back in the dark ages when I was at school, I was taught that ' have got' and ''ve got' were totally unacceptable; the only acceptable form in writing and formal speech was 'have', but ' 've ' was commonly heard in informal conversation.
    Similarly, BE as a full verb was often, and acceptably, contracted in conversation.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Switzerland

    • Join Date: Aug 2009
    • Posts: 1,676
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6

    Re: You've a lot of pictures.

    Quote Originally Posted by fivejedjon View Post
    I am surprised that some regard it as an error. Back in the dark ages when I was at school, I was taught that ' have got' and ''ve got' were totally unacceptable; the only acceptable form in writing and formal speech was 'have', but ' 've ' was commonly heard in informal conversation.
    Similarly, BE as a full verb was often, and acceptably, contracted in conversation.
    I guess you need to go back to school.

Similar Threads

  1. need for pictures
    By rdetim in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26-Nov-2007, 01:41
  2. go to the pictures
    By Morpheus in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Jul-2007, 21:56
  3. pictures
    By Unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-Mar-2007, 18:05
  4. Pictures cannot be seen!
    By Fazzu in forum Support Area
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-Jul-2006, 08:16
  5. pictures
    By Isabelle Dupot in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-Nov-2005, 17:53

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •