Could you tell me if the following sentence is grammatically correct? (Put its reason aside…)
There is no single company which holds a legitimate mechanism for replacing the management.
Or is this better:
Not a single company holds a legitimate mechanism for replacing the management.
Last edited by motico; 27-Jan-2011 at 21:37.
Ignoring how little sense it makes, the first sounds like if two or more joined up, it might work. There is no single one, but a couple together could...
The second one says no company exists.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.