[Grammar] query on syntactic analysis

Status
Not open for further replies.

YaninaG

New member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Argentina
Current Location
Argentina
I would like to discuss how to analyse this sentence:
I saw her crying.
In my opinion, crying cannot be analysed as an objective complement because, according to R.Quirk, an o.complement shares the same characteristics of the subjective complement. Then, i should say the relationship is not an intensive one in this sentence.
As far as i am concerned, i would analyse HER CRYING as an object relised by a non finite clause with its own subject (not the same subject as the one in the main clause)
What is your view on the topic?
Thanks
 

Coolfootluke

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I am not a teacher.

I would call "crying" an adjective modifying "her", pure and simple. I saw her green with envy. I saw her enraged. You saw a crying Matilda.

"Saw" cannot operate on "her" in a way that permits "crying" to be an object complement, and it is not copulative, either.

I can think of no objection to your view that "her crying" is a clause used as an object, though.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I would like to discuss how to analyse this sentence:
I saw her crying.
In my opinion, crying cannot be analysed as an objective complement because, according to R.Quirk, an o.complement shares the same characteristics of the subjective complement. Then, i should say the relationship is not an intensive one in this sentence.
As far as i am concerned, i would analyse HER CRYING as an object relised by a non finite clause with its own subject (not the same subject as the one in the main clause)
What is your view on the topic?
Thanks

***** NOT A TEACHER *****


Ms. G.,


(1) I do not know what Professor Quirk said, but I know that

many people respect his opinions.

(2) I have found, however, two examples from grammar books that

feel a sentence such as yours is an example of an objective complement.

(a) We found him strumming a guitar. The words in bold modifies the

direct object him.

Source: Pence & Emery, A Grammar of Present-Day English (New York:
Macmillan Publishing, 1963), p. 50.

(b) We saw them eating peanuts. The same analysis as for (a).

Source: House & Harman, Descriptive English Grammar (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1950), page 291.

*****


By the way, House & Harman agree with you on one point:

The object and ... the objective complement have the force

of a clause, though they do not constitute a true clause, for a

clause should contain a finite (predicating) verb; and participles

are nonfinite verb forms.
 

Bamako4

Banned
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Andorra
Current Location
Anguilla
IMO it goes like this:

1. I saw [her (to) cry].
2. I saw [her (to be) crying].

In either sentence, the bracketed part, a nonfinite clause, is the direct object of "saw". It is "she was crying" or "she cried" that received my seeing, and not "she".
 

Bamako4

Banned
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Andorra
Current Location
Anguilla
I am not a teacher.

I would call "crying" an adjective modifying "her", pure and simple.

Let us take a look at what implications your view would have:


I saw her very crying. :cross:
I saw her crying intensely. :tick:

"intensely" is a VP adverb and hinges on "crying. :up:


The present participle "crying" seems to have more like a verbal force than an adjectival force.
 

YaninaG

New member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Spanish
Home Country
Argentina
Current Location
Argentina
Thank you very much, indeed and sorry for replying so late. The thing is, i did not receive an e mail to let me know i had been replied. This is how it works, isnt it? Sorry, but i´m new here.
It´s great to share opinions. TA!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top