Is there anything wrong with the following sentence?
He is a person of redoubtable charachter.
So would you please express it in a more natural way keeping the word redoubtable.
Last edited by 5jj; 28-Mar-2011 at 10:39. Reason: typo
I don't mind using it of a person's character - as long as it's what you mean. Just because someone is undoubtedly of the right character (whatever you have defined that to be), or one could never doubt his word, that doesn't make him redoubtable. (The fact that a word has 'doubt' in it doesn't automatically qualify it as being about reliability. A redoubtable thing - often an army or fortress or system of defences - is of such a kind as to make potential aggressors doubt their own chances. Next time I'm passing a decent dictionary I must check whether it was formed with reference to the term in military architecture - Redoubt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia .)