giant of a man vs a giant man

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlexAD

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Belarus
Current Location
United States
Hello.

Does the 'giant of a man' give you more impression than the 'a giant man' or there is no difference between them?

Thanks, Alex.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Hello.

Does the 'giant of a man' give you more impression than the 'a giant man' or there is no difference between them?

Thanks, Alex.

We wouldn't say "a giant man". We'd just say "a giant". The adjective you probably want is "gigantic".

A "giant of a man" is more emphatic though.

He is very tall.
He is a giant.
He's a gigantic man.
He's an absolute giant of a man!

Note that gigantic might not mean very tall - it could mean he's very large (either fat or just has an extremely large physical frame).
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
:up: ... but 'giant' is sometimes used as an adjective, especially in the names of animals - such as the Giant Sloth (also known as Ground sloth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). Perhaps because of this use in animal names, I would regard as acceptable 'The Yeti is a sort of giant man, said to live in parts of Tibet'. In this case the sords 'sort of' imply that we are dealing not with a gigantic man, but with a giant-like being that looks a bit like a man.

b
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top