[Grammar] additional 'not'

Status
Not open for further replies.

suprunp

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Might and might not in the permission sense are rare, occurring chiefly in polite questions:
Might I (not) have a word with you?
I wonder whether I might (not) have a word with you.

A comprehensive grammar of the English language (Randolph Quirk) [1]

Unfortunately I couldn't find information (although, I am sure [1] contains it) as to when and where (and with what modal verbs) I can use an 'additional not' and what tinge it gives to a sentence. I can surmise from [1] that it can occur in polite questions (and I'm confident that sometimes I have seen it used, although I can't provide you with a decent example now).

Would you be so kind to help me with this issue?

Thanks.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
The simple answer is - Forget 'not'. If 'not' seems illogical to you, then it probably is to most native speakers. Such utterances are more natural without 'not'.

A longer answer would involve a discussion on (pseudo-)diffidence in dated upper-middle-class English, which would be irrelevant to most learners today.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I could still use not if I were asking a big favour or pushing my luck.
 

suprunp

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Might I not ask you another small question? :)

I have recently encountered a sentence that looked like this:
Could I not justifiably claim [...].

Partly because
Such utterances are more natural without 'not'.
I had had a hard time working out what the author actually wanted to convey until I inquired what it really meant. In this case "could I not" was just another way of saying "couldn't I" and so "not" could be justifiably dispensed with.

Another reason why I struggled with this sentence was that given the examples A comprehensive grammar of the English language (Randolph Quirk) gives us:
I visit them not infrequently. = fairly frequently.
He writes not inelegantly. = rather elegantly.
I thought (somewhat unjustifiably, as turned out) that not could negate justifiably here.

Is it possible to view this kind of sentences in the latter way, or should I always view "could I not" (and such) in similar cases as "couldn't I" or simply as "could I"?

Thanks.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Is it possible to view this kind of sentences in the latter way, or should I always view "could I not" (and such) in similar cases as "couldn't I" or simply as "could I"?
It depends on context.

A: I think you'd better stay at home tonight.
B: Could I not go?
= Couldn't I go? (Could I go?) - I want to go.

A: I really think you ought to go.
B: Could/Couldn't I not go?
= Is it possible for me not to go? - I don't want to go.

A: You couldn't pass that test even if you studied for a year.
B. Could I not? =
Couldn't I? [STRIKE]Could I?[/STRIKE]- You are wrong; I could.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top