Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: to be to

  1. #1
    licinio is offline Junior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    99
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default to be to

    If she were to eat fish more often, she might get to like it.

    Can I say "was to" instead of "were to"?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    5jj's Avatar
    5jj is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28,167
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: to be to

    Quote Originally Posted by licinio View Post
    Can I say "was to" instead of "were to"?
    Yes. Purists prefer the subjunctive 'were', but many native speakers aren't too concerned about it.

    Note that there is no infinitive form of the verb, i.e no '(to) be to'. If we wish to refer to the verb we have to use some cumbersome form such as 'am/are/is(/was/were) to'.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •