Can we trust Wikipedia the website?

Status
Not open for further replies.

cawatawa

Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Arabic
Home Country
Algeria
Current Location
Algeria
Hi everybod

I was told that we can not consider the website Wikipedia as a source of reference .
Is that right?

The second question is :
Is the Algerian a dialect or a language?

Thank you
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Hi everybod

I was told that we can not consider the website Wikipedia as a source of reference .
Is that right?

There's good and bad in it. Use it carefully.

The second question is :
Is the Algerian a dialect or a language?

Thank you

Someone (Wikipedia would tell you who ;-)) said a language was 'a dialect with an army'. The line between them is thin, fuzzy, and arguable. Politics usually comes into it. Scots can be seen as a dialect of English, akin to Northumbrian. But on their web site Wir Ain Lied claim vociferously that it's a language. You'll get similar arguments about Algerian. Reliable authorities will line up on either side of the argument.

b
 

konungursvia

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
To me, they're two languages if they cannot be mutually understood by ordinary speakers without specific education in the other.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
I was told that we can not consider the website Wikipedia as a source of reference .
Yes. A Wikipedia article is no better, and no worse, than the person who edited it last - perhaps ten seconds before you looked at it.

Wikipedia is a wonderful resource. I cannot now imagine life without it. I use it several times a day, every day of the year, but it has no value as a source of reference. We have no idea who edited the articles last. It is magnificent for finding information quickly and efficiently and, given that obvious misinformation is usually corrected within minutes by self-appointed editors, the information is usually accurate and very up-to-date.

But, you cannot quote as a reference an article that may have been written only ten minutes ago by the eleven-year-old thug who lives next door to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top