Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: fewer no less

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Jan 2012
    • Posts: 902
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #11

    Re: fewer no less

    Quote Originally Posted by SoothingDave View Post
    Yes, that's it! To make logical/mathematical sense, it should say "500, no more."
    No, saying that it was condensed means the effort was towards fewer words, therefore “no fewer” correctly limits the accomplishment. The problem is the conflation of “fewer than 500 words”, which is approximate, with “no less" which is precise; it grates the ear. Kind of like hearing, “why don’t you invite your entire friend [sic] to the party.”

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,827
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #12

    Re: fewer no less

    It's a poor choice of expression for amazement when used right after a numerical figure.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Jan 2012
    • Posts: 902
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: fewer no less

    Quote Originally Posted by SoothingDave View Post
    It's a poor choice of expression for amazement when used right after a numerical figure.
    Again, no it's not, in my opinion. "He condensed the work down to 493 words, no less." reads much better with an exact numerical figure.

  1. Barb_D's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 17,790
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #14

    Re: fewer no less

    But Bob, the point was "no less" was being used to show excitement over the act, not to quanitfy the number of words.

    If you replaced "no less" with "by Jove!" you'd have the same sentiment expressed, but no one would try to pair "by Jove" with a number.
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,827
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #15

    Re: fewer no less

    He condensed the work down to 493 words, no less.
    Do you think "no less" is a comment on the number of words? I did originally, but for that to make sense it must be "no more."

    Instead, it seems that "no less" is used as an expression to mean "can you believe it?" or something similar.

    If I wrote "You must write an essay of 500 words, no less" you would (hopefully) understand that I mean that you must have 500 words as a minimum.

    This literal meaning is what my mind goes to when reading this sentence. Since it was meant as an expression of wonder and not a literal limitation on the number that precedes it, I find it a poor expression to choose.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Jan 2012
    • Posts: 902
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #16

    Re: fewer no less

    Quote Originally Posted by SoothingDave View Post
    Do you think "no less" is a comment on the number of words? I did originally, but for that to make sense it must be "no more."
    I stand by my comment that "no more" is incorrect. "No less", if reference to cardinality, is correct, unless you think that "no more" means "no more condensing", which to me is even more odd.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Jan 2012
    • Posts: 902
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #17

    Re: fewer no less

    Quote Originally Posted by Barb_D View Post
    But Bob, the point was "no less" was being used to show excitement over the act, not to quanitfy the number of words.
    Ah, I see now, but I still think the same sort of conflation is occurring here. "No less" can invoke cardinality (although I see now that that is not the intent), which conflicts with the ambiguity of “less than 500”. I like the “by jove” suggestion.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,827
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #18

    Re: fewer no less

    Quote Originally Posted by BobSmith View Post
    I stand by my comment that "no more" is incorrect. "No less", if reference to cardinality, is correct, unless you think that "no more" means "no more condensing", which to me is even more odd.
    "It was condensed to no more than 500 words."

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Jan 2012
    • Posts: 902
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #19

    Re: fewer no less

    Quote Originally Posted by SoothingDave View Post
    "It was condensed to no more than 500 words."
    That is not the original construct. Try this:

    "He had managed to expand his vocabulary by 100 words, no more."

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,827
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #20

    Re: fewer no less

    The point of "fewer" is an upper limit. "No more" is also an upper limit. It was condensed to fewer than 500 words, no more.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Use of fewer and less
    By gasoria in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-May-2010, 08:14
  2. fewer and less
    By Offroad in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-Apr-2010, 09:26
  3. less/fewer
    By GUEST2008 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-Aug-2009, 23:00
  4. [Grammar] less or fewer
    By The French in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25-Jul-2009, 18:06
  5. fewer? less?
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2004, 18:33

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •