Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Tedwonny is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    320
    Post Thanks / Like

    Question terrible with/at?

    I've heard some teachers say she's terrible with names but some say terrible at...

    which's correct?
    thanks

  2. #2
    5jj's Avatar
    5jj is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28,167
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: terrible with/at?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tedwonny View Post
    I've heard some teachers say "she's terrible with names" but some say "terrible at..."

    which's is correct? We don't contract 'is' after 'which'.
    Both are acceptable.

  3. #3
    Raymott's Avatar
    Raymott is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    19,761
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: terrible with/at?

    5jj is right, but you can't generalise that beyond names.

    I'm terrible at chess/dancing... (Not 'with')
    I'm terrible with women/animals... (Not 'at')

  4. #4
    Tedwonny is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    320
    Post Thanks / Like

    Question Re: terrible with/at?

    thanks

    So, it's more like
    at + things/activities you're bad at, say I'm terrible at Maths/sports....

    with + things/activities is not so direct, say, I'm terrible with names = I'm terrible at memorizing/recalling the names of my students.

    Is that right?
    thanks

  5. #5
    Raymott's Avatar
    Raymott is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    19,761
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: terrible with/at?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tedwonny View Post
    thanks

    So, it's more like
    at + things/activities you're bad at, say I'm terrible at Maths/sports....

    with + things/activities is not so direct, say, I'm terrible with names = I'm terrible at memorizing/recalling the names of my students.

    Is that right?
    thanks
    Yes.

Similar Threads

  1. I'm terrible = I'm sorry
    By keannu in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2011, 15:54
  2. horrible vs terrible
    By thx0110 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-Dec-2009, 13:14
  3. terrible sentence
    By JiriLindovsky in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14-Dec-2007, 00:10
  4. he has terrible aim
    By angliholic in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16-Sep-2007, 03:41

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •