Results 1 to 3 of 3
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 2,057
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Has 'must be' be changed to 'had to be' in reported speech?

    The general informed his troops, "We must be ready as the enemy is preparing to attack us tonight."

    I have reported the above speech as follows. Is it necessary to change 'must' to 'had'. I think it is not necessary. Am I right?

    The general informed his troops that they had to be ready as the enemy was preparing to attack them that night.

    Thanks.

  1. moonlike's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Persian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • Iran

    • Join Date: Mar 2012
    • Posts: 463
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: Has 'must be' be changed to 'had to be' in reported speech?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tan Elaine View Post
    The general informed his troops, "We must be ready as the enemy is preparing to attack us tonight."

    I have reported the above speech as follows. Is it necessary to change 'must' to 'had'. I think it is not necessary. Am I right?

    The general informed his troops that they had to be ready as the enemy was preparing to attack them that night.

    Thanks.
    Both can be correct. It depends. If the reported speech happened exactly the same day that it was mentioned you don't need to change the tense "must". If it's reported one day later or more, yes you change the tense "had to".
    Good luck

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: Has 'must be' be changed to 'had to be' in reported speech?

    You are right. If you are writing in an examination, I'd recommend that you use 'had to', especially if the examination is to be marked by non-native speakers (some of whom insist on rules they have read being followed), but many native speakers would use 'must'.

Similar Threads

  1. [Vocabulary] 'need be'
    By wotcha in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-Dec-2011, 06:38
  2. [Grammar] 'even if it be' or 'even if it were'?
    By eeshu in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2011, 06:06
  3. 'to be' and 'to have'
    By RAJESH in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-Jul-2007, 09:22
  4. verb 'be' and 'to be'
    By ashok in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2006, 02:57
  5. 'to be'
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-Jun-2003, 14:54

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •