Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. eggcracker's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: May 2012
    • Posts: 269
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Is it still natural to change "at first hand" into "directly" this sentence?

    The President visited the area to see the devastation at first hand.
    Is it natural and grammatical to change "at first hand" into "directly" or "on his eyes" above sentence?


    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2009
    • Posts: 3,505
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: Is it still natural to change "at first hand" into "directly" this sentence?

    Quote Originally Posted by eggcracker View Post
    The President visited the area to see the devastation at first hand.
    Is it natural and grammatical to change "at first hand" into "directly" or "on his eyes" above sentence?

    My first preference would be "first hand" ("at" is not necessary).
    "Directly" is OK.
    "On his eyes" is not a correct term, but you could use "with his own eyes".

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-Sep-2011, 18:49
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-Sep-2008, 09:27
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-Sep-2008, 12:33
  4. confusing words "expressed" or "express" and "named" or"names"
    By Dawood Usmani in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-Oct-2007, 20:33
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-Jul-2005, 14:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •