Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: to

  1. #1
    Taka is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,074
    Post Thanks / Like

    to

    Suppose this girl was the sole survivor of the fire. Would you interpret this sentence below as such?

    She was the only one to survive the fire.

  2. #2
    Barb_D's Avatar
    Barb_D is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    17,532
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    Yes. I would assume there were at least two other people, who both died in the fire. However, there could have been 200 others, not just two. But more than one other.
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

  3. #3
    Taka is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,074
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    So the one with the to-infinitive means the same as this?

    She was the only one who (had) survived the fire.

  4. #4
    Barb_D's Avatar
    Barb_D is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    17,532
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    Yes, though I'd say stick with simple past, not past perfect.

    He was the only one to solve the puzzle.
    He was the only who who solved the puzzle. Same

    But you can't say "He was the first to solve the puzzle" and make that "He was the first who solved the puzzle." It works with "the only one" but not "the first one."
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

  5. #5
    emsr2d2's Avatar
    emsr2d2 is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    24,960
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    Quote Originally Posted by Barb_D View Post
    Yes. I would assume there were at least two other people, who both died in the fire. However, there could have been 200 others, not just two. But more than one other.
    If only one other person was involved and that person died, how would you state the OP's sentence about the one person who died?
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  6. #6
    Barb_D's Avatar
    Barb_D is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    17,532
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    With only two people in total, "the only" seems wrong, survivor or victim.
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

  7. #7
    emsr2d2's Avatar
    emsr2d2 is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    24,960
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    I used to live next door to a lovely couple, John and Sarah. One night, their boiler exploded and the house caught fire. Unfortunately, John was the only one to survive.

    How would you have written it?
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  8. #8
    Barb_D's Avatar
    Barb_D is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    17,532
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    Perhaps "but only John survived"?
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

  9. #9
    emsr2d2's Avatar
    emsr2d2 is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    24,960
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    Quote Originally Posted by Barb_D View Post
    Perhaps "but only John survived"?
    Ah, I thought it was the use of the word "only" that you objected to. However, it appears to be "the only one" that you have a problem with. I see your point. I don't entirely agree with it (just for once) but I understand.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  10. #10
    5jj's Avatar
    5jj is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28,167
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: to

    Quote Originally Posted by emsr2d2 View Post
    Ah, I thought it was the use of the word "only" that you objected to. However, it appears to be "the only one" that you have a problem with. I see your point. I don't entirely agree with it (just for once) but I understand.
    I'm with you on this one. I have no particular objection to 'the only one' of two.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •