Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Ukrainian
      • Home Country:
      • Ukraine
      • Current Location:
      • Ukraine

    • Join Date: Sep 2010
    • Posts: 3,437
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    didn't need to have been ever used?

    "We didn't need to have been in such a hurry. The train pulled out only half an hour after we got to the train station."

    Could I say that? Would it sound better with "shouldn't have been in such a hurry"?
    Last edited by ostap77; 15-Sep-2012 at 21:29.

  1. bhaisahab's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England

    • Join Date: Apr 2008
    • Posts: 23,086
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    Quote Originally Posted by ostap77 View Post
    "We didn't need to have been in such a hurry. The train pulled out only half an hour after we got to the train station."

    Could I that? Would it sound better with "shouldn't been in such a hurry"?
    Either way it's unnatural.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Ukrainian
      • Home Country:
      • Ukraine
      • Current Location:
      • Ukraine

    • Join Date: Sep 2010
    • Posts: 3,437
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    How would you put it?

  2. Barb_D's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 17,569
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    Part of the problem is that you say "only" which shows you think the time was very short.
    It's a good thing we hurried - the train pulled out only five minutes after we got there.
    We didn't need to have hurried - the train didn't pull out until half an hour after we got here.
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    I'd use We needn't have hurried.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Ukrainian
      • Home Country:
      • Ukraine
      • Current Location:
      • Ukraine

    • Join Date: Sep 2010
    • Posts: 3,437
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    Would it be totally unnatural to say "We didn't need to have been in a hurry"?
    Last edited by ostap77; 15-Sep-2012 at 23:36.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    Maybe only 87%.

  3. BobK's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2006
    • Posts: 15,854
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #8

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    I'd say it was unnatural: what you didn't need to have done was hurry (not be in a hurry). So 'needn't have hurried' sounds more natural.

    After that, as Barb said, the 'only' sounds odd. You want to say how long the difference was between 'just in time' and '30 minutes after we arrived'. I'd say somethig like 'We needn't have hurried. The train pulled out only a good half an hour after we got to the train station.' (No need to repeat 'train'; we already know you caught a train there, so we don't need to be told what sort of station it was.)

    b

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Jan 2009
    • Posts: 1,507
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #9

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    BrE would prefer needn't have been... while AmE speakers will (I believe) tend to prefer the non-modal form, as used here. Shouldn't have been would be different in meaning.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Ukrainian
      • Home Country:
      • Ukraine
      • Current Location:
      • Ukraine

    • Join Date: Sep 2010
    • Posts: 3,437
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #10

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    What meaning would that be if I said "We shouldn't have hurried......."? I'll go on with the next sentence. "We're going to have to do without the suitcase we left at home" OK? Is better to use "have" or "need" as in "going to have/need......"?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •