Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 25,880
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #11

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    "We shouldn't have hurried" suggests that it was actually a bad idea. "We needn't have hurried" simply states it wasn't necessary.

    As far as the suitcase sentence goes, "We will have to do without it" is the correct form.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Ukrainian
      • Home Country:
      • Ukraine
      • Current Location:
      • Ukraine

    • Join Date: Sep 2010
    • Posts: 3,438
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #12

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    "going to have" would sound wakward here?

  2. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 25,880
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: didn't need to have been ever used?

    Quote Originally Posted by ostap77 View Post
    "going to have" would sound awkward here?
    Do you mean "We are going to have to do without the suitcase"? That's absolutely fine and means exactly the same as "We will have to do without the suitcase".
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •