[Grammar] I tried to do so several times, but the fact is/was that I failed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
In the sentence 'I tried to do so several times, but the fact is/was that I failed.'

In view of consistency, we usually will choose WAS, but sometimes I think IS is also OK, because the fact's status of being true is not past!

What do you think?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Use "is" - the fact is still true now.
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
Thank you. But why must the past tense used here?: 1949 was the year in which China collapsed.

The year 1949 of course is past, but the status of being true is, agian, not past.
 

Chicken Sandwich

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Netherlands
Thank you. But why must the past tense used here?: 1949 was the year in which China collapsed

NOT A TEACHER

I think that this sentence also works with "is". The choice of tense would depend on the tense used in the rest of the text.
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
I am interested in history, and I read many books on this subject; whenever a year is mentioned, it is WAS but not IS.

Could anyone think of a situation IS is used?
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
In Oxford Advanced 8th, a sentence: It was Chaucer who really turned English into a literary language.

In what situation can WAS be turned into IS?
 

Chicken Sandwich

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Netherlands

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
Is the historical present being used here?
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Is the historical present being used here?
The 'historical present' is simply a label, an attempt to slot one usage of the present tense into a helpful category. "In 1817 Louis XVIII writes to the Czar" is an example of this - using the present tense for a clearly past event.

I don't think that "1817 is the year which Louis XVIII, with a certain royal assurance which was not wanting in pride, entitled the twenty-second of his reign" really fits into that category, but others may disagree. I think that the writer plucks 1817 from a list of years; as such "1817" exists in the present. Had the 'was' been 'is' and 'entitled' been 'entitles', then s/he would have been using a 'historical present'
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
You could simplify the whole issue by saying "I tried to do so several times but failed". ;-)
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
Thank you all. I know that when I am talking to foreigners, I can dodge some usages unfamiliar, but it will be slipshod, and I am interested in knowing how to explain the grammar behind.
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
How about the following sentence:

America is/was the first and only country to establish a republican without failure.

If I use was, won't there be implications that America is now not?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
How about the following sentence:

America is/was the first and only country to establish a republic without failure.

If I use was, won't there be implications that America is now not?
No, it's OK with either "is" or "was". It's factually incorrect though.
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
Thank you.

I know I can simplify the things, but I hope to know which form of verb I should use.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top