And what if after all the bodies are carried out on stretchers, the man is still brought to trial for shouting fire in a crowded theater, and in his defense he points to the burnt ruins of the theater as proof that there really was a fire, only to be told that if he hadn't shouted, then there would have been no fire.
More:The Innocence of Obama | RSN Pick of the Day Right Side News
Had he not shouted, then there would have been no fire. Is it correct? I just want to learn how to use inversion to make it more formal.