[Grammar] Sequence of Tenses

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr.Lucky_One

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
"I heard them say they are going home and getting numb."

Is the sentence above right?
Shoudn't there be "were" in the sentence?
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
'Were' is correct.

If the fact that they are going home is still true at the moment of reporting, 'are' is also possible.

What do you mean by 'getting numb'?
 

Mr.Lucky_One

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
To get numb is to get so drunk you can't feel your arms, legs, face, etc.
Do you think it's possible to use this phrase to describe such a state?
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
To get numb is to get so drunk you can't feel your arms, legs, face, etc.
Do you think it's possible to use this phrase to describe such a state?
I've not heard it used this way.
 

Chicken Sandwich

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Netherlands
***** NOT A TEACHER *****

I've not heard it used this way.

Neither have I, but the Urban Dictionary has an entry for this phrase.

I don't think that it's a well-established phrase (only three thumbs up). Most people would say 'Let's get wasted!' or 'Let's get hammered!' rather than 'Let's get numb!'

As an aside, there is a related phrase. I was feeling no pain after my first drink.
 

Mr.Lucky_One

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
There is the context in the urban dictionary.

-Hey girl, what are the guys doing tonight?
-Oh those a******s, I heard them say they are going home and getting numb.

So is it right that there is "are" rather than "were"? Or maybe it is non-standart English.
Here is the question that interests me much more than phrase "getting numb".
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
T
So is it right that there is "are" rather than "were"? Or maybe it is non-standart English.
Here is the question that interests me much more than phrase "getting numb".
I answered that in post #2.
 

Mr.Lucky_One

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
'Were' is correct.

If the fact that they are going home is still true at the moment of reporting, 'are' is also possible.

What do you mean by 'getting numb'?

Yes, but is "were" correct in all possible cases, even if they are going home at the moment of reporting?
 

Mr.Lucky_One

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Well, I find it rather hard for me.

Could you give a link or advise me any book where I could find any informaton about using a present tense in subordinate clause, while main clause was in a past tense?

Because the only thing I've found is that we can use a presen tense in subordinate clause when
subordinate clause expresses some universal truth. But I guess it's not our case.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
When the thing reported is introduced by a past-tense verb of speech, backshifting is always correct. However, if the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not essential.

On Monday, John says to Peter, "I am going to France on Wednesday",
On Tuesday, Peter reports: John told me he was/is going to France tomorrow/on Wednesday.
On Thursday, Peter reports: John told me he was[STRIKE]/is[/STRIKE] going to France yesterday/on Weednesday.
 

Mr.Lucky_One

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Thank you very much.
I hope that there are no other cases of using present tense in subordinate clauses when using past tense in main clauses, exept in the case of universal truth and the case of which you've told me.:)

I just wonder why the things you've just explained me are not written anywhere. At least I couldn't have found them.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
I just wonder why the things you've just explained me are not written anywhere.
Oh, but they are. The first grammar I picked from my shelf , Quirk et al (1985.187-8) says:

"In Indirect Speech [...] the past tense in the reporting verb tends to make the verb of the subordinate clause past tense as well. This phenomenom, known as backshift, is normally optional [...]" (my emphasis added).

Leech (2004.108) writes, of avoiding backshifting:

"The implication of this avoidance of backshifting is that the time of the original utterance ('then') and the time of the of report ('now') are both included within the time-span during which the statement in the reported clause remains valid."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top