Suggestions.can someone correct please?
" Remakes are actually quite popular, once the studios can make money based on classic films. Successes of
the lastprevious decades are always a good choice. But sometimes they change a lotsignificantly the original story. One example of this caseis "Beauty and the Beast".
Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot's classc novel "Beauty and the beast", was originally written as a play, and when ("it was filmed" OR "filmed") for the first time, the studios
haspreserved the original structure.
In contrast, Walt Disney's remake is different from the original. The script had a "new face" and has become a musical. Sound effects
waswere used by the director. Remakes usually use and abuse oftechnology, and the Walt Disney's version eitherdid also (OR "did too").
Both films are good, but the original has the magic of the story while the remake
has the beautiful appearancehas tremendous visual appeal. Watching them I could see a lot of differences and analysing each one I still prefer the first, even if it has beenwas made fifty years ago.
Personally, I like both, but I prefer the original. Maybe if Walt Disney had preserved it as a play instead of turning it into a musical, the remake
could becouldhave been much better than the original. Sometimes the classics are forever (great final statement). "