Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Odessa Dawn's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Arabic
      • Home Country:
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Current Location:
      • Saudi Arabia

    • Join Date: Aug 2012
    • Posts: 1,242
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    "machines whose interests don't include us"



    He wants to bring more attention to a future in which mankind might be at the mercy of "machines that are not malicious, but machines whose interests don't include us."

    He said that advanced technology could be a threat when computers start to direct resources towards their own goals,at the expense of human concerns like environmental sustainability.

    More: Will machines kill mankind? Cambridge academics want to know - News - Gadgets & Tech - The Independent

    Do the underlined parts share/have the same meaning?

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: "machines whose interests don't include us"

    Not exactly. The second is the start of a process; the first is a later stage.

Similar Threads

  1. Why Possessive Apostrophe isnít used in "U.S. interests"?
    By Odessa Dawn in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14-Aug-2012, 03:57
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-May-2012, 07:01
  3. [Grammar] "Switch/Switches of the machines"
    By Snappy in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-Sep-2010, 20:33
  4. [Grammar] Is "much more machines" wrong?
    By ilovepsycho in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23-Nov-2009, 15:19
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-Jan-2006, 05:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •