Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: which or that

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Indonesian
      • Home Country:
      • Indonesia
      • Current Location:
      • Indonesia

    • Join Date: Aug 2011
    • Posts: 6
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Talking which or that

    Hi,

    I read in a book that in the sentence: That is the kind of man (that) I dislike, we can't replace the relative pronoun that with which. Why is that so? Is the antecedent kind or man?

    Thank you in advance,
    Tri

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Jan 2009
    • Posts: 1,507
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: which or that

    Quote Originally Posted by tri3hary View Post
    Hi,

    I read in a book that in the sentence: That is the kind of man (that) I dislike, we can't replace the relative pronoun that with which. Why is that so? Is the antecedent kind or man?

    Thank you in advance,
    Tri

    Primarily because the clause is restrictive, 'that' is much more natural, although I would not go so far as to call 'which' here ungrammatical.

    The antecedent here, if a single word had to be selected, is 'kind' rather than 'man', although, since reference is really to both in terms of the entire phrase 'kind of man', the point is somewhat moot.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •