Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: If Rechard was

  1. #1
    notletrest is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • China
      • Current Location:
      • China
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    551
    Post Thanks / Like

    If Rechard was

    Dear teachers,
    How do you think of these?
    " 1.If Rechard was at the recepion last night, he must have been presented to the president.
    2.If Rechard spoke at the recepion last night, he must have been presented to the president."
    I don't think they are right.(EC86.5.20),because they expressed facts opposite to the past. If 1. is right, so is 2.
    Thanks!

  2. #2
    bhaisahab's Avatar
    bhaisahab is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    23,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: If Rechard was

    Quote Originally Posted by notletrest View Post
    Dear teachers,
    What do you think of these?
    " 1.If Rechard was at the recepion last night, he must have been presented to the president.
    2.If Rechard spoke at the recepion last night, he must have been presented to the president."
    I don't think they are right.(EC86.5.20),because they expressed facts opposite to the past. If 1. is right, so is 2.
    Thanks!
    They are both correct.

  3. #3
    emsr2d2's Avatar
    emsr2d2 is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    24,916
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: If Rechard was

    The use of "If he was there" only suggests that either the speaker doesn't know for sure that he was there, or that someone else has said he was there and the speaker is making an assumption based on that statement.

    If A is true, then B must be true.

    If the speaker knew for a fact that Rechard wasn't at the reception, he would have said:

    If Rechard had been at the reception, he would have been presented to the president.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  4. #4
    notletrest is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • China
      • Current Location:
      • China
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: If Rechard was

    Quote Originally Posted by bhaisahab View Post
    They are both correct.
    According to you, we can obtain the conclusion: In the "if" clause of condition, we can use simple past tense or past perfect tense to express facts opposite to the past at will. What do you think of it?
    Thanks!

  5. #5
    notletrest is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • China
      • Current Location:
      • China
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: If Rechard was

    Quote Originally Posted by emsr2d2 View Post
    The use of "If he was there" only suggests that either the speaker doesn't know for sure that he was there, or that someone else has said he was there and the speaker is making an assumption based on that statement.

    If A is true, then B must be true.

    If the speaker knew for a fact that Rechard wasn't at the reception, he would have said:

    If Rechard had been at the reception, he would have been presented to the president.
    I completely accept your idea. From you I got to know the if clause of the original 1# (If Rechard was at the reception laslt night, he must have been presented to the president,) has nothing to do with the subjunctive mood,but it is in indicative mood. It doesn't suggest the assumption opposite the past reality. Am I right?
    Thank you !
    Thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •