Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    NewHopeR is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • China
      • Current Location:
      • China
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,049
    Post Thanks / Like

    Does "Natural evil as necessity" mean "Natural evil that is viewed as necessity"?

    Context:

    Natural evil as necessity
    The natural-evil-as-necessity argument is meant to be a response to the classic philosophical argument of the Problem of Evil, which contends that an all-powerful, all-knowing and beneficent God cannot exist as such because natural evil (mudslides which crush the legs of innocent children, for instance) occurs. Peacocke contends that the capacities necessary for consciousness and thus a relationship with God also enable their possessors to experience pain, as necessary for identifying injury and disease. Preventing the experience of pain would prevent the possibility of consciousness. Peacocke also takes an eastern argument for natural evil of that which made must be unmade for a new making to occur; there is no creation without destruction. To Peacocke, it is necessary that organisms go out of existence for others to come into it. Thus, pain, suffering and death are necessary evils in a universe which will result in beings capable of having a relationship with God. God is said to suffer with His creation because He loves creation, conforming the deity to be consistent with the Christian God.

  2. #2
    BobK's Avatar
    BobK is online now Harmless drudge
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,752
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Does "Natural evil as necessity" mean "Natural evil that is viewed as necessity"?

    I haven't read your post, as it doesn't interest me. But 'The natural-evil-as-necessity argument' is the argument that natural evil (whatever that is) is an unavoidable feature of the human condition. ('Necessity' has nothing to do with physical need in this context; it is logical necessity - that which must ['necessarily'] be true, given the postulates. I'm not sure from your paraphrase whether you understand this.)

    b

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-Jun-2012, 11:33
  2. what does mean:"traces of evil always remain"?
    By purecopper in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13-Jun-2009, 03:40
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-Sep-2008, 12:33
  4. Necessity of subject after "but"
    By gorikaz in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-Sep-2006, 06:59
  5. "BE TO" to express necessity
    By hela in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-Apr-2006, 09:46

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •