Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,557
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    2 may not make sense, but in the structure of A(part) of B where B is plural, if a number is allocated impliciltly or explicitly to A, would you say a singular verb for A? Even in 1, we don't know the number of mountains - it could be 3 - but they just choose plural verbs.

    1. I saw a lot of mountains in the region. One third of the mountains were higher than 1km...
    2. (I saw three mountains in the region.) One third of the mountains was higher than 1km...

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,369
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    I would use "were."

  2. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 24,988
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    Quote Originally Posted by SoothingDave View Post
    I would use "were."
    So would I, not least because it's very unlikely that there are just 3 mountains in one location.
    Last edited by 5jj; 06-Feb-2013 at 17:54.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,369
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    Quote Originally Posted by emsr2d2 View Post
    So would I, not least because it's very unlikely that there are just 3 mountain in one location.
    Yes, they do tend to congregate.

  3. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,557
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    This might be the question of logic, what about the following? They are unlikely to say the other way of (were).
    They would say "One of the twins" instead of this, but if they say "half", does the verb also have to be "were"? I don't think so, it should be "was". Maybe the mountain case depends on common sense of numerous mountains in one location.
    All I want to know finally is if A(part) of B(plural) is strict in English, but I guess not.

    ex)Half of the twins was(were) so sad.

  4. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 24,988
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    It's irrelevant. We would not say "Half the twins ..." when talking about one of two people.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Jan 2009
    • Posts: 1,507
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    The plurality of 'mountains' necessitates a plural verb here.

    The number of mountains actually referred to is irrelevant.

  5. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 24,988
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #8

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    That's not strictly correct. It does matter how many mountains are being referred to:

    - One of the mountains is taller than the others.
    - Two of the mountains are shorter than the others.
    - Several of the mountains are eroding.

    The verb refers to the number of mountains mentioned, not to the word "mountains".
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  6. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #9

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    Quote Originally Posted by emsr2d2 View Post
    The verb refers to the number of mountains mentioned, not to the word "mountains".
    I agree with philo on 'A third of the mountains were ...'. In the highly unlikely event that anybody would want to say this when there were only three mountains, the plural verb would be appropriate.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Jan 2009
    • Posts: 1,507
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #10

    Re: One third of the mountains was higher than 1km

    That's not strictly correct. It does matter how many mountains are being referred to:

    - One of the mountains is taller than the others.
    - Two of the mountains are shorter than the others.
    - Several of the mountains are eroding.

    The verb refers to the number of mountains mentioned, not to the word "mountains".

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Quite so, in these cases.

    In the case under discussion, however, the sentence begins, not with a pronominal form, but with a fraction, and fractions in English, in common with certain other expressions such as 'the rest', count as quantifiers. That is, they do not determine verbal number (that privilege devolving to their explicit or implicit object nouns).

    One-third of the coffee WAS drunk, and the rest WAS thrown away.
    One-third of the respondents WERE unhappy with the decision, but the rest WERE apathetic.
    Two-thirds of the coffee WAS drunk, and the rest WAS thrown away.
    Two-thirds of the respondents WERE unhappy with the decision, but the rest WERE apathetic.


    etc.
    Last edited by philo2009; 08-Feb-2013 at 07:20.

Similar Threads

  1. In/on the mountains.
    By ratóncolorao in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 20-Jan-2012, 20:16
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-Jul-2011, 15:21
  3. in the mountains, on the mountain
    By sitifan in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-Oct-2010, 13:13
  4. a higher mark/higher marks
    By Tan Elaine in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-Mar-2010, 12:38
  5. on/in the mountains
    By sitifan in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-Oct-2008, 14:34

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •