Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 24,990
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #11

    Re: no more than three things

    No more than three = Not more than three.
    Three is the maximum number of whatever we're talking about. There could be one, two or three, but no more.

    You can bring no more than three guests to the party.
    means:
    You can come alone, or you can bring one, two or three guests to the party. You cannot bring four, five etc guests.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  2. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,559
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #12

    Re: no more than three things

    In other threads about this kind of topic, I have seen that "no more than" is different from "not more than", and now I find quite the opposite here. I feel ashamed of having lied to Koreans about this so far, and I feel a great pity on that.

  3. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 24,990
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: no more than three things

    If you can find those threads and give the links to them, I would like to read them.
    Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.

  4. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,559
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #14

    Re: no more than three things

    If "no more than" is equal to "not more than", then should the following examples be corrected?

    1.She is no more than a whore (ie she is as bad as a whore, before) => She is equal to or less than a whore(now)
    2.She is no less than a saint (ie she is as good as a saint, before) => She is equal to or more than a saint.(now)
    3.She is no more beautiful than Liz Taylor.(She is as beautiful as Liz Taylor, before) => She is equally beautiful or less beautiful than Liz Talyor.(now)

    * "Before" means my previous interpretation, while "now", the current interpretation according to your advice.
    * I'll try to find the related threads and let you know later.

  5. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,559
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #15

    Re: no more than three things

    My grammar book says the following.
    ex)I have no more than 2 dollars. Treat me! (no more than = only)
    I have no less than 50 dollars. I'll treat you. = I have as much as 50 dollars.

    If this is a fake, and they have faked me so far, I'd bettet abandon this book. I don't know where they got this idea and wrote this. Did Korean or Japanese grammar book writers create their own English grammar?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,372
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #16

    Re: no more than three things

    Quote Originally Posted by keannu View Post
    If "no more than" is equal to "not more than", then should the following examples be corrected?

    1.She is no more than a whore (ie she is as bad as a whore, before) => She is equal to or less than a whore(now)
    2.She is no less than a saint (ie she is as good as a saint, before) => She is equal to or more than a saint.(now)
    3.She is no more beautiful than Liz Taylor.(She is as beautiful as Liz Taylor, before) => She is equally beautiful or less beautiful than Liz Talyor.(now)

    * "Before" means my previous interpretation, while "now", the current interpretation according to your advice.
    * I'll try to find the related threads and let you know later.
    There is really not a lot of difference when you are not talking about numbers. For instance, #1 is basically saying that she is a whore and nothing more than that.

    #2 says she is a saint or even better.

    When discussing numbers the value given is a limit, as we have said earlier. If you have "no more than 2 dollars" then 2 dollars is the maximum you have. You might have less.

  6. Raymott's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 20,227
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #17

    Re: no more than three things

    Quote Originally Posted by keannu View Post
    "Only three", but some Americans seem to think it as same as "not more than", which gives me the idea of variety or diversity of language.
    I don't think being American has anything to do with it. They mean the same.

  7. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,559
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #18

    Re: no more than three things

    1. Thanks a lot! I admit that I have been perceiving the difference between "no more than" and "not more than" wrong so far, but I have one last question regarding 1 to 3. Numbers can have boundary, so I can estimate the range.
    But for 1 to 3 above, as you said,
    in 1, does it mean "she<= whore" or just "she = whore"? If you want to say equality, you would say "she is as bad as a whore". What is the difference between "She is no more than a whore" and "she is as bad as a whore"?
    I'd like to ask the same thing for 2 and 3, but if I know 1, 2 and 3 will be automatically solved.

    2. Can I also ignore and disregard so many grammar books' description in Korea like this? I don't know where they got this idea.
    I have no more than 2 dollars. Treat me! (no more than = only)
    I have no less than 50 dollars. I'll treat you. = I have as much as 50 dollars.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Apr 2009
    • Posts: 10,372
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #19

    Re: no more than three things

    Not many will worry about such a fine point. The gist is that you are saying she is a whore. Technically, it is saying that she is, at best, a whore.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-Jun-2010, 06:50
  2. [Grammar] There are a lot of things or There are lots of things?
    By Williamyh in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-Nov-2009, 03:13
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-Sep-2009, 11:50
  4. lot of things or lots of things
    By eversmiling in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2008, 18:16
  5. What are the good things and the bad things about Indonesia?
    By reyhn in forum Editing & Writing Topics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-Oct-2007, 03:13

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •