sancti
New member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- French
- Home Country
- France
- Current Location
- France
Hi everybody,
I live in France and I'm preparing my ielts test.
I have a lack of writing skills. Unfortunetely I do not have a teacher to correct me.
I hope you could help me to correct the following essay.
Some say that economic development is the solution to poverty: others say it is the cause of poverty. What is your opinion?
With many concerns in the less-developed countries such as unemployment and hunger, many people think that establish a strong industrial base could increase the living standard in poor nations. But others say it only give advantages to international investors. In this essay, I will discuss some arguments for and against a development policy in poor countries.
There is several arguments for showing that improve the economy of a pauperized country will help to fight against the poverty. First of all, Industrialisation decreases the unemployment. Creating resources from industries automatically improves the living standard. Another advantage is that to run this economy, graduate are needed. The population will get access to a strong education system. In addition, people in developing countries will get a better purchasing power. The amount of goods that can be bought by an inhabitant will literally increase.
However, not everyone is agree with this theory. Deep down, the economic development make only benefit for the international investors. People from rich countries invest to be wealthier. A second point is that a wealth inequality occur between various group in the society. Governments and elite groups take advantage of it but not the poor farmer in the countryside. A third issue is that development does not respect the environment and create serious damage. Labour's health is directly hurt by the phenomenon due to using chemical products like fertilizer.
I agree that economic development do not always change a poor society in the fairly way. However, I am convinced that help to fight against the unemployment and hunger. I really think that not giving access to the development to a pauperized nation is ruthlessness even though inequality will still continue to exist.
Thank you very much
I live in France and I'm preparing my ielts test.
I have a lack of writing skills. Unfortunetely I do not have a teacher to correct me.
I hope you could help me to correct the following essay.
Some say that economic development is the solution to poverty: others say it is the cause of poverty. What is your opinion?
With many concerns in the less-developed countries such as unemployment and hunger, many people think that establish a strong industrial base could increase the living standard in poor nations. But others say it only give advantages to international investors. In this essay, I will discuss some arguments for and against a development policy in poor countries.
There is several arguments for showing that improve the economy of a pauperized country will help to fight against the poverty. First of all, Industrialisation decreases the unemployment. Creating resources from industries automatically improves the living standard. Another advantage is that to run this economy, graduate are needed. The population will get access to a strong education system. In addition, people in developing countries will get a better purchasing power. The amount of goods that can be bought by an inhabitant will literally increase.
However, not everyone is agree with this theory. Deep down, the economic development make only benefit for the international investors. People from rich countries invest to be wealthier. A second point is that a wealth inequality occur between various group in the society. Governments and elite groups take advantage of it but not the poor farmer in the countryside. A third issue is that development does not respect the environment and create serious damage. Labour's health is directly hurt by the phenomenon due to using chemical products like fertilizer.
I agree that economic development do not always change a poor society in the fairly way. However, I am convinced that help to fight against the unemployment and hunger. I really think that not giving access to the development to a pauperized nation is ruthlessness even though inequality will still continue to exist.
Thank you very much