Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. saloom2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Arabic
      • Home Country:
      • Egypt
      • Current Location:
      • Egypt

    • Join Date: Jan 2013
    • Posts: 319
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    Smile Which referring to a whole clause.

    Hello everyone,

    Does this comma make any difference in this sentence?

    He decided to see the doctor about the problem(,) which had been bothering him.
    I wish I had better English, but I work hard to improve it. I'm studying for IGCSE, so I'm only interested in BrE.

  2. 5jj's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Czech Republic

    • Join Date: Oct 2010
    • Posts: 28,167
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: Which referring to a whole clause.

    Quote Originally Posted by saloom2 View Post
    Does this comma make any difference in this sentence?

    He decided to see the doctor about the problem(,) which had been bothering him.
    Yes.

    Without the comma, he wanted to see the doctor about the-problem-which-was-bothering-him.

    With the comma, he wanted to see the doctor about a known problem. That problem, incidentally, was bothering him. The comma brackets off non-essential information.

  3. konungursvia's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Canada

    • Join Date: Mar 2009
    • Posts: 4,911
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: Which referring to a whole clause.

    I don't think it ends up making all that much difference. The same problem is indicated either way; we're just not clear whether the second clause was planned well in advance, or strung on the previous one as a near-afterthought. Consider, for instance, on the other hand:

    His brother put on the new Led Zeppelin record, which he found irritating.
    His brother put on the new Led Zeppelin record which he found irritating.

    In the first case, the irritable fellow may love Led Zeppelin, but could have been bothered by the fact his brother put one on -- while he was trying to concentrate on a novel, for instance.
    In the second case, it is much more likely that the content of the recording was the problem, not the brother or his timing.

    Does that make any sense?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-Apr-2010, 15:13
  2. what is IT referring to?
    By kiranlegend in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2008, 12:31
  3. who referring to teams
    By retro in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-Apr-2008, 09:21
  4. Referring
    By AUTOMOON in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-Sep-2007, 11:51
  5. referring joyfulness
    By rajaganapathy in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-May-2005, 15:42

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •