Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    keannu's Avatar
    keannu is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,378
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default in the pragmatic application of knowledge than with abstract theorizing

    Considering the whole flow of the Chinese centralism ignoring others, wouldn't "pragmatic application of knowledge" be contrary to their idea? If they want to practice western knowledge, isn't it a change from their past tendancy? Or it might mean they just want to take only the surficial outcomes, not seeking for the inherent aspect of knowledge, which is also compliant with their centralism.

    st213)An event that took place in the early fifteenth century is r
    evealing about the differences between Europe and China. This was the voyage of the Grand Eunuch, onwhich hundreds of ships technologically vastly superior to the Pinta, the Nina, and the Santa Maria sailed from China to South and Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Africa, loaded with wealth andwonders. The voyage achieved its primary goal, which was toconvince the nations bordering on the Indian Ocean, the PersianGulf, and the Red Sea that China was superior in virtually every way totheir own societies. But the Chinese were quite uninterested in seeing anything that those societies might have produced or known about ─ including even a giraffe that their African hosts showed them . The Chinese merely contended that the animal was known to them as a qi lin, a creature whose appearance was expected at the time of important events, such as the birth of a great emperor .
    This lack curiosity of was characteristic of China. The inhabitants of the Middle Kingdom China's name for itself, meaning essentially “the center of the world” had little interest in the tales brought to them by foreigners . Moreover, there has never been a strong interest in knowledge for its own sake in China . Even modern Chinese philosophers have always been far more interested in the pragmatic application of knowledge than with abstract theorizing for its own sake.

  2. #2
    Raymott's Avatar
    Raymott is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    19,765
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: in the pragmatic application of knowledge than with abstract theorizing

    Quote Originally Posted by keannu View Post
    Considering the whole flow of the Chinese centralism ignoring others, wouldn't "pragmatic application of knowledge" be contrary to their idea? If they want to practice western knowledge, isn't it a change from their past tendancy? Or it might mean they just want to take only the surficial outcomes, not seeking for the inherent aspect of knowledge, which is also compliant with their centralism.

    st213)An event that took place in the early fifteenth century is revealing about the differences between Europe and China. This was the voyage of the Grand Eunuch, onwhich hundreds of ships technologically vastly superior to the Pinta, the Nina, and the Santa Maria sailed from China to South and Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Africa, loaded with wealth andwonders. The voyage achieved its primary goal, which was toconvince the nations bordering on the Indian Ocean, the PersianGulf, and the Red Sea that China was superior in virtually every way totheir own societies. But the Chinese were quite uninterested in seeing anything that those societies might have produced or known about ─ including even a giraffe that their African hosts showed them . The Chinese merely contended that the animal was known to them as a qi lin, a creature whose appearance was expected at the time of important events, such as the birth of a great emperor .
    This lack curiosity of was characteristic of China. The inhabitants of the Middle Kingdom China's name for itself, meaning essentially “the center of the world” had little interest in the tales brought to them by foreigners . Moreover, there has never been a strong interest in knowledge for its own sake in China . Even modern Chinese philosophers have always been far more interested in the pragmatic application of knowledge than with abstract theorizing for its own sake.
    I don't think centralism has anything to do with it; neither does isolationism. How do these things conflict with a national tendency not to value knowledge for its own sake? You say that China wants to practice western knowledge, but this proposition is not in your paragraph; so there's reason why the paragraph should explain it.

  3. #3
    keannu's Avatar
    keannu is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,378
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: in the pragmatic application of knowledge than with abstract theorizing

    I don't know what the author means by "pragmatic application of knowledge" vs "abstract theorizing". Are they opposing each other? "abstract theorizing" sounds pursuit of knowledge while "pragmatic application of knowledge" just sounds acceptance of technology or something.

  4. #4
    Raymott's Avatar
    Raymott is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    19,765
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: in the pragmatic application of knowledge than with abstract theorizing

    Quote Originally Posted by keannu View Post
    I don't know what the author means by "pragmatic application of knowledge" vs "abstract theorizing". Are they opposing each other? "abstract theorizing" sounds pursuit of knowledge while "pragmatic application of knowledge" just sounds acceptance of technology or something.
    "Pragmatic application of knowledge" means using knowledge (application of knowledge) only when and where it's useful (pragmatic).
    "Abstract theorising" is pursuing knowledge (theorizing) for its own sake, regardless of whether it has any practical applications (abstract).

Similar Threads

  1. [Essay] Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from book
    By hieppham90 in forum Editing & Writing Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Dec-2009, 12:58
  2. Discourse analysis, pragmatic, jargon..questions?
    By Ever Student in forum Linguistics
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 19-Nov-2009, 10:24
  3. Pragmatic vs. Discourse needs of ESL students
    By Linguisticat in forum Teacher Training
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 22-Jan-2009, 11:56
  4. knowledge of, a knowledge of (continued)
    By joham in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-Dec-2007, 14:42
  5. pragmatic aspect of a sentence
    By Unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-May-2007, 06:27

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •