Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    keannu's Avatar
    keannu is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,363
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default without representation

    What does this "representation" mean historically? I guess England taxed America, which probably angered them to try to gain independence, but how is "representataion" related here?

    st210)Before
    the political separation between America and England , there was a cultural separation that can be traced to American conditions ; and the cultural separation was what led to the desireamong Americans for political separation. The beliefs Americans had enculturated by 1760 made the issue of taxation without representation so momentous that they were willing to go to war over it. The king of England and majorities in the House of Lords and the House of Commons never believed

  2. #2
    SoothingDave is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    9,799
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: without representation

    I am impressed that you are studying the American revolution and its causes.

    The idea of "representation" here is that of a representative in the legislative body in Parliament. It is a principle of the English system of gov't (as I understand it as an American who inherited many aspects of it) that all taxes are to be raised by the legislature (and not the King). The people retain the right and the responsibility to ensure the funding of the gov't that they decide to have.

    During he time of the American colonies, the people who lived in America did not have representation in the British Parliament. They had no vote that made a difference in how the British gov't conducted itself and raised revenue. But they were taxed by this gov't.

    This was the major cause (as we understand it today) of the revolution. The revolution started because the American colonists wanted their rights as British subjects, including the right to be represented in Parliament. There were also issue of the mercantile system and how the colonies were only supposed to supply raw materials to the mother country and buy all finished products from her.

Similar Threads

  1. for this representation gap ?
    By keannu in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-Jun-2011, 17:54
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-Jun-2011, 10:50
  3. [General] prportional representation/man-of-war/clue up/at large
    By vil in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-Jul-2009, 13:47
  4. any representation to the contrary
    By emily wong in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-Aug-2005, 06:43

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •