Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. keannu's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • South Korea

    • Join Date: Dec 2010
    • Posts: 4,587
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    mixed grains of enriched fake rice

    Isn't "in" redundant here? I think it should be removed. What do you think?

    42) Iron deficiency and its more serious consequence, anemia, are especially common among people who do not eat meat or cannot afford it, and who therefore survive on grains. Wheat and maize are often enriched with iron. But rice has proved hard to enrich without negatively affecting its appearance or flavor. Diego Moretti at Wageningen University and his colleagues tried using ‘fake’ rice made out of iron-enriched rice-flour dough and shaped by machine into grains. They mixed grains of enriched fake rice in with real rice and served it to iron-deficient school children in India.

  2. probus's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Canada

    • Join Date: Jan 2011
    • Posts: 2,568
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: mixed grains of enriched fake rice

    You could argue successfully that it is redundant but that does not make it wrong. It is very natural. Language is not logic.

Similar Threads

  1. [Vocabulary] Grain or grains
    By florin1990 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15-Jun-2012, 16:49
  2. enriched with
    By ripley in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-Mar-2005, 05:03

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •