Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    mogu is offline Newbie
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    31
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Which sounds more natural, "I visited it" or "I visited there"

    If there is a word signifying a place in an aforementioned sentence, I'm not sure which word is more natural to indicate the place after the verb "visit" in the following sentence, "it" or "there." For instance, "I have been to New York before. I visited it three times." or "I have been to New York before. I visited there three times." Grammatically speaking, the verb "visit" is commonly used as a transitive verb (at least I was taught as it is), so it should be followed by a noun or pronoun. Therefore, "it" should be correct because "there" is basically an adverb (although there are some dictionaries in which it is also listed as a pronoun). That said, "there" sounds more natural to me in this case. Please let me hear native English speakers' opinions.

  2. #2
    konungursvia's Avatar
    konungursvia is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Canada
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,780
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Which sounds more natural, "I visited it" or "I visited there"

    It's a good question. 'There' might be preferable to 'it' in your New York example, but I agree both sound doubtful in some way, especially since you change from the present perfect to the preterite. Quite common in AmE, but not such eloquent speech. In any case, the first sentence of your example actually reminds me of artificial text-book speech, the type of utterance you're not really likely to hear in any case, but which may appear in a learner's phrase book.

    Formal: "I have been to New York. In fact, I've visited [there/it] three times."
    Informal AmE: "I've been to New York. Three times."

  3. #3
    MikeNewYork's Avatar
    MikeNewYork is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,776
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Which sounds more natural, "I visited it" or "I visited there"

    Quote Originally Posted by mogu View Post
    If there is a word signifying a place in an aforementioned sentence, I'm not sure which word is more natural to indicate the place after the verb "visit" in the following sentence, "it" or "there." For instance, "I have been to New York before. I visited it three times." or "I have been to New York before. I visited there three times." Grammatically speaking, the verb "visit" is commonly used as a transitive verb (at least I was taught as it is), so it should be followed by a noun or pronoun. Therefore, "it" should be correct because "there" is basically an adverb (although there are some dictionaries in which it is also listed as a pronoun). That said, "there" sounds more natural to me in this case. Please let me hear native English speakers' opinions.
    In your proposed use, dictionaries classify "there" as a noun, meaning "that place".

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17-Sep-2012, 04:23
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-Jul-2012, 19:53
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Jun-2012, 12:52
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-Jun-2012, 19:30
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-Sep-2008, 11:33

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •