Gaëlle1
New member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2014
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- French
- Home Country
- France
- Current Location
- UK
Hello,
I have a question concerning the analysis of a passive sentence that I find tricky:
"There was no thought given to a quick word about what might happen if they did not pass the bar exam."
It first seemed to me that I was dealing with an extraposition of the subject "not thought" and that the non-extraposed clause was "No thought was given to a quick word about...". But then I realized that the structure was different from an extraposition.
As it seems to me that we cannot say "There was given no thought to a quick word about" (but I am not a native so I can't be so sure, I may be mistaken), could the sentence to be analysed this way :
There was [no thought [that was given to a quick word about what might happen if they did not pass the bar exam]].
This would mean that there is an ellipsis of the relative pronoun "that" and of the auxiliary "be". This would also mean that "was" and "given" don't form one passive verbal phrase, but that "was " is an active verbal phrase and that "given" forms a passive verbal phrase together with the elided auxiliary "be" ; this verbal phrase would be the head of the relative clause "that was given to a quick word about what might happen if they did not pass the bar exam", which would postmodify the noun "thought".
I hope this makes sense, I am not so sure it does. Does anyone thinks it is the correct analysis?
Many thanks,
Gaëlle
I have a question concerning the analysis of a passive sentence that I find tricky:
"There was no thought given to a quick word about what might happen if they did not pass the bar exam."
It first seemed to me that I was dealing with an extraposition of the subject "not thought" and that the non-extraposed clause was "No thought was given to a quick word about...". But then I realized that the structure was different from an extraposition.
As it seems to me that we cannot say "There was given no thought to a quick word about" (but I am not a native so I can't be so sure, I may be mistaken), could the sentence to be analysed this way :
There was [no thought [that was given to a quick word about what might happen if they did not pass the bar exam]].
This would mean that there is an ellipsis of the relative pronoun "that" and of the auxiliary "be". This would also mean that "was" and "given" don't form one passive verbal phrase, but that "was " is an active verbal phrase and that "given" forms a passive verbal phrase together with the elided auxiliary "be" ; this verbal phrase would be the head of the relative clause "that was given to a quick word about what might happen if they did not pass the bar exam", which would postmodify the noun "thought".
I hope this makes sense, I am not so sure it does. Does anyone thinks it is the correct analysis?
Many thanks,
Gaëlle