dalia malak
New member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Arabic
- Home Country
- Iraq
- Current Location
- American Samoa
kindly ,find the weakness point in this essay
Stop and frisk
If there is a building where a window is damaged, it could lead to a crash of the whole building. The Broken window theory is an interesting theory. It was the foundation for stop and frisk Law, which revolved around a lot of doubts and problems in the past decade. It also faced a lot of rejection from the civilian population and members of police department. Because under the stop and frisk exception, the police can stop people on the street and pat them down for anything illegal, as long as they have suspicion. Racial profiling also played a huge part in sB 250, because it became motivated by hatred of black or Hispanic.
Every action has a reaction. The use of pressure by the Police Department on their members to achieve the most number of stop and frisk led to a high rate of random searches on the street. In the interview with the police commissioner, Ray Kelly said, “that people are comfortable with this law.” when the media asked him about the reason that 87% of those who were stopped were Africans American or Latino, he replied that “the general appearance is why.” Ray Kelly and Mayor Michael Bloomberg supported this law, which led to the rate rise of the stop and frisk to 600%. In the past decade, the police have stopped about 1800 people a day to be searched without a charge against them. Julio Valentin , NYPD officer Ret. A professor in John Day college of criminal justice, said in an interview that “one percent of those who stopped were unarmed ,and that is frightening that (stop and frisk) became just a numbers game where they are compared to what struck the policeman in the past year and the police man are Compelled to do it” .
Being a human being with a different appearance does not mean you are a criminal. Alvin was a simple civilian, who was stopped by the police more than once, he recorded what happened. The video showed the invective, threats, and ill-treatment suffered at the hand of the police. This video was the spark that ignited the rejection against this law. The day after the Nation published this video, the New York police department stops the sB250. The district court judge for the southern district of New York, found stop and frisk to be unconstitutional and racially discriminatory. In addition to the testimony against the police department from the police men that suffered from not having a union to protect them and support them.
As for Racial profile, it played a serious role in stopping and searching a lot of civilians based on race, age, or style of wearing apparel as well as religion. Judge Shira Scheindlin wrote “no one should live in fear of being stopped whenever leaves his home to go about the activities of daily life.” Judge shira found that the police department resorted to a policy indirect racial profiling. As it increased the number of stops in minority communities. That has led to officers routinely stopping blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white.
Finally, if society dose not trust the police, who can they trust? Society will be an easy target for drug dealers and criminals, because there is no link between the people and the police. Also, if there are elements such as justice, trust, and respect between the police and the people that ingredient will be a good Fence to protect the community. Every citizen in the community, regardless of race, religion, age or color, must have a solid claim with the most important vital organ: the police.
Stop and frisk
If there is a building where a window is damaged, it could lead to a crash of the whole building. The Broken window theory is an interesting theory. It was the foundation for stop and frisk Law, which revolved around a lot of doubts and problems in the past decade. It also faced a lot of rejection from the civilian population and members of police department. Because under the stop and frisk exception, the police can stop people on the street and pat them down for anything illegal, as long as they have suspicion. Racial profiling also played a huge part in sB 250, because it became motivated by hatred of black or Hispanic.
Every action has a reaction. The use of pressure by the Police Department on their members to achieve the most number of stop and frisk led to a high rate of random searches on the street. In the interview with the police commissioner, Ray Kelly said, “that people are comfortable with this law.” when the media asked him about the reason that 87% of those who were stopped were Africans American or Latino, he replied that “the general appearance is why.” Ray Kelly and Mayor Michael Bloomberg supported this law, which led to the rate rise of the stop and frisk to 600%. In the past decade, the police have stopped about 1800 people a day to be searched without a charge against them. Julio Valentin , NYPD officer Ret. A professor in John Day college of criminal justice, said in an interview that “one percent of those who stopped were unarmed ,and that is frightening that (stop and frisk) became just a numbers game where they are compared to what struck the policeman in the past year and the police man are Compelled to do it” .
Being a human being with a different appearance does not mean you are a criminal. Alvin was a simple civilian, who was stopped by the police more than once, he recorded what happened. The video showed the invective, threats, and ill-treatment suffered at the hand of the police. This video was the spark that ignited the rejection against this law. The day after the Nation published this video, the New York police department stops the sB250. The district court judge for the southern district of New York, found stop and frisk to be unconstitutional and racially discriminatory. In addition to the testimony against the police department from the police men that suffered from not having a union to protect them and support them.
As for Racial profile, it played a serious role in stopping and searching a lot of civilians based on race, age, or style of wearing apparel as well as religion. Judge Shira Scheindlin wrote “no one should live in fear of being stopped whenever leaves his home to go about the activities of daily life.” Judge shira found that the police department resorted to a policy indirect racial profiling. As it increased the number of stops in minority communities. That has led to officers routinely stopping blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped if they were white.
Finally, if society dose not trust the police, who can they trust? Society will be an easy target for drug dealers and criminals, because there is no link between the people and the police. Also, if there are elements such as justice, trust, and respect between the police and the people that ingredient will be a good Fence to protect the community. Every citizen in the community, regardless of race, religion, age or color, must have a solid claim with the most important vital organ: the police.
Last edited by a moderator:
